Analysis
Who Owns Mischief Reef? A Tale of Lost Fishermen and Rising Tensions
In 1995, Filipino fishermen seeking shelter from a storm stumbled upon a curious sight in the South China Sea. What they thought was a safe haven turned out to be something far more controversial—Mischief Reef, with mysterious new structures built by foreign hands. This seemingly barren atoll, once a quiet fishing ground, has since become a flashpoint for geopolitical drama. Nations argue, navies patrol, and diplomats debate over its true ownership. But how did this reef, submerged at high tide and far from the shores of its contenders, become a symbol of power and dominance in one of the world’s most contested waters? Let’s unravel the intrigue surrounding Mischief Reef and its ownership.
The Battleground Called Mischief Reef
Mischief Reef, also known as Panganiban Reef in the Philippines and Meiji Jiao in China, is no ordinary speck of land in the South China Sea. Situated roughly 250 kilometers west of the Philippine island of Palawan, this low-tide elevation may seem unremarkable at first glance. But don’t be fooled—this coral reef has become a microcosm of the fierce geopolitical struggle playing out across one of the world’s busiest waterways. Once a quiet fishing ground for locals, Mischief Reef now stands at the epicenter of heated debates over sovereignty, control, and maritime power.
Who Really Owns Mischief Reef?
The answer to this seemingly simple question is anything but straightforward. China, the Philippines, and Vietnam all lay claim to this strategic reef, making its ownership one of the most contested issues in modern geopolitics. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled that Mischief Reef lies within the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and has no legal basis as Chinese territory. Yet, China’s sprawling military installations on the reef—complete with airstrips, radar systems, and hangars—paint a different picture, one of power projection and dominance. The reef is now a fortified stronghold, sparking alarm across Southeast Asia and beyond.
Why does the South China Sea matter?
The stakes couldn’t be higher. The South China Sea is more than just a patch of ocean—it’s a maritime superhighway carrying over $3.4 trillion in annual trade. Beneath its waves lies untapped oil and gas reserves that could power entire nations, while its waters teem with some of the world’s richest fishing grounds. Control of key locations like Mischief Reef isn’t just about territorial pride; it’s about commanding vital resources, trade routes, and strategic military footholds.
As the region’s nations and external powers like the United States clash over this prized body of water, one thing is clear: the battle for Mischief Reef is far from over, and its story is one the world can’t afford to ignore.
The Philippines’ Claim: A Legal and Geographic Case
Legal Basis: The Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the Philippines holds a strong legal basis for its claim over Mischief Reef. Located just 250 kilometers from Palawan, the reef lies well within the Philippines’ 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), granting the country sovereign rights to explore and exploit marine resources in the area. Mischief Reef is not just close to Philippine shores—it’s far from China’s mainland, more than 1,200 kilometers away, raising fundamental questions about Beijing’s territorial assertions.
Adding complexity to the dispute, Mischief Reef is classified as a “submerged feature,” which, according to international law, cannot be claimed as sovereign territory by any nation. Instead, such features are considered part of the seabed and subject to the EEZ of the nearest coastal state. For the Philippines, this legal clarity under UNCLOS is central to its argument: Mischief Reef lies within its EEZ, making China’s occupation and fortification a clear violation of Philippine rights.
The PCA Ruling (2016): A Landmark Legal Victory
In a historic decision, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague ruled decisively in favor of the Philippines in 2016, rejecting China’s sweeping claims over the South China Sea. The tribunal concluded that Beijing’s “nine-dash line”—a loosely defined boundary encompassing nearly 90% of the South China Sea—had no basis in international law. Specifically regarding Mischief Reef, the PCA determined that: Mischief Reef is a low-tide elevation, meaning it cannot generate territorial seas or exclusive economic zones. The reef lies entirely within the Philippines’ EEZ, granting the Philippines sovereign rights over its resources. China’s activities, including the construction of artificial islands and military facilities, violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights.
The tribunal’s scathing critique of China’s actions is summed up in its findings: “China has no historic rights to resources within the sea areas falling within the ‘nine-dash line.’” This legal declaration invalidated China’s expansive claims, reaffirming the Philippines’ rightful position under international law.
Significance of the Ruling
The PCA’s decision marked a watershed moment for the Philippines, delivering a significant legal and moral victory in one of the most contentious maritime disputes of modern times. It underscored the principle that might does not make right and bolstered the rules-based international order. However, while the ruling is legally binding, China has dismissed it outright, continuing its activities on Mischief Reef and other contested areas.
For the Philippines, the ruling is both a validation of its sovereignty and a rallying point for international support. The challenge remains: how can Manila enforce its legal win in the face of a rising superpower determined to reshape the South China Sea? The answer to that question will shape the future of this vital maritime region.
China’s Stance: The Historical and Strategic Chessboard
Historical Claims and the “Nine-Dash Line”
China’s claim to Mischief Reef, like much of the South China Sea, is rooted in its controversial “nine-dash line”—a boundary first published on maps in the 1940s that encompasses nearly 90% of the sea. Beijing asserts that its fishermen and traders have used the South China Sea for centuries, reinforcing its narrative of “historic rights.” However, this claim is hotly contested, as international law, including UNCLOS, does not recognize historical maps as a valid basis for maritime entitlements.
China often invokes the principle of “indisputable sovereignty” to justify its control over the region. By framing its South China Sea claims as a matter of national pride and territorial integrity, Beijing positions itself as unwilling to compromise, further complicating diplomatic efforts. Yet, critics argue that China’s historical narrative is selective and lacks concrete evidence to substantiate its expansive claims, especially over submerged features like Mischief Reef.
China’s Rejection of the PCA Ruling
The 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), which invalidated China’s claims under the nine-dash line, was outrightly dismissed by Beijing. Labeling the tribunal as “illegitimate” and its decision as “null and void,” China has refused to participate in or recognize the proceedings. Beijing’s rationale? It argues that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction over matters involving territorial sovereignty and insists that its claims predate UNCLOS, making them immune to such rulings.
China’s rejection reflects a broader strategy: asserting its dominance while disregarding international legal frameworks it perceives as unfavorable. By ignoring the PCA ruling, Beijing has signaled its intent to settle disputes on its own terms, often through a combination of diplomatic pressure, economic leverage, and military might.
Actions on Mischief Reef: A Fortress in the Making
China’s activities on Mischief Reef have transformed it from a submerged coral atoll into a strategic military stronghold. Since the mid-2010s, Beijing has conducted massive land reclamation projects, creating over 550 hectares of artificial land. Satellite imagery reveals a sprawling military complex, including airstrips, radar systems, hangars for combat aircraft, harbors for warships, and missile defense systems. These installations are not just symbolic—they’re strategic assets aimed at projecting power across the South China Sea.
For the Philippines and other claimant states, China’s militarization of Mischief Reef poses significant challenges. It undermines Philippine sovereignty, threatens the region’s stability, and raises concerns about Beijing’s long-term intentions. China’s fortified presence on Mischief Reef effectively turns it into an unsinkable aircraft carrier, giving Beijing a strategic advantage in the South China Sea.
The Implications for the Region
China’s actions on Mischief Reef have shifted the balance of power in the South China Sea. For the Philippines, this encroachment erodes its maritime rights and highlights the challenges of enforcing the PCA ruling. For other claimant states and external powers like the United States, it signals an urgent need to counter China’s growing dominance. The reef, once an obscure feature, is now a geopolitical flashpoint that underscores the larger struggle for control over one of the world’s most strategic waterways.
The Role of Other South China Sea Nations: Navigating the Crossroads of Sovereignty
A Sea of Overlapping Claims
The South China Sea dispute is not just a bilateral tug-of-war between the Philippines and China; it’s a multilateral conundrum involving Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei, all of whom have competing claims to portions of the sea. Vietnam asserts historical sovereignty over large sections of the Spratly and Paracel Islands, bolstered by its continuous presence and activities in the region. Malaysia claims parts of the Spratly Islands based on their proximity to its continental shelf, while Brunei stakes a modest claim to the southern reaches of the Spratly chain, aligning with its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Although their territorial claims do not directly extend to Mischief Reef, these nations view China’s actions on the reef and the broader South China Sea with growing unease. Beijing’s militarization and its sweeping nine-dash line affect their own economic and security interests, creating a shared sense of vulnerability and urgency.
Perspectives on Mischief Reef and China’s Actions
Vietnam has been particularly vocal in its opposition to China’s aggressive tactics, frequently lodging formal protests and deploying naval forces in disputed areas. Its historical claims to the Spratlys overlap with China’s, and the country perceives Beijing’s actions at Mischief Reef as part of a broader strategy to undermine Vietnamese sovereignty. Similarly, Malaysia, which has traditionally pursued quieter diplomacy, has begun taking a firmer stance in recent years, filing submissions to the United Nations to affirm its maritime rights. Brunei, while generally more reserved, quietly aligns with ASEAN’s collective calls for the peaceful resolution of disputes and adherence to international law.
For these nations, the implications of China’s militarization of Mischief Reef are clear: it sets a dangerous precedent, enabling Beijing to unilaterally alter the region’s balance of power and diminish their own claims.
Joint Statements and Cooperative Efforts
Recognizing the need for unity in the face of China’s assertiveness, South China Sea nations have occasionally banded together to voice their concerns. ASEAN, the regional bloc that includes all claimant states, has repeatedly emphasized the importance of peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. Though its statements are often carefully worded to avoid alienating China, ASEAN has called for the early conclusion of a Code of Conduct—a legally binding agreement to manage disputes in the region.
On bilateral levels, Vietnam and the Philippines have enhanced their maritime cooperation, conducting joint naval drills and sharing intelligence to counterbalance China’s dominance. In 2024, Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines issued coordinated protests against China’s establishment of new “administrative districts” in disputed territories, signaling a growing willingness to present a unified front.
Towards a United Front?
While collective action remains challenging due to differing national interests and levels of dependence on China, the overlapping concerns of South China Sea nations highlight the need for greater collaboration. For Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei, China’s actions at Mischief Reef are not just a Philippine problem—they are a regional issue that threatens the sovereignty and security of all claimant states. Whether through ASEAN or smaller coalitions, the road ahead will likely demand a balance of diplomacy, legal action, and strategic partnerships to address an increasingly assertive China.
The International Community’s Perspective: Safeguarding a Global Commons
Global Concerns over China’s Assertiveness
The South China Sea is far more than a regional dispute; it’s a critical artery of global commerce, with one-third of the world’s maritime trade—worth an estimated $3.4 trillion annually—passing through its waters. As China builds military installations on features like Mischief Reef and asserts dominance through its expansive nine-dash line, the international community has grown increasingly alarmed. Beijing’s actions threaten to upend the delicate balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, sparking fears of militarized conflict and economic disruption in one of the world’s most vital regions.
For many nations, the South China Sea is a test case for the broader principle of respecting international law and the sovereignty of smaller states. China’s refusal to abide by the 2016 PCA ruling and its aggressive reclamation projects are widely seen as violations of international norms, raising concerns about Beijing’s willingness to flout global rules in pursuit of unilateral gains.
Freedom of Navigation and the Rule of Law
At the heart of the international community’s concerns is the principle of freedom of navigation. With vital sea lanes cutting through the South China Sea, ensuring unimpeded access for commercial and military vessels is a global priority. China’s militarization of Mischief Reef and its harassment of foreign vessels have cast a shadow over this freedom, prompting fears of restricted access or outright blockades. Upholding the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is seen as critical not only for resolving disputes but for maintaining peace and stability across the Indo-Pacific.
The international community has repeatedly emphasized the need for all parties to adhere to the rule of law. In recent years, global powers have stressed that the PCA ruling, while unenforceable, serves as a legal benchmark that must be respected to preserve the integrity of international maritime law.
The Role of the United States and Other Nations
The United States has taken a leading role in countering China’s assertiveness, conducting regular Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) in the South China Sea. These patrols, often near disputed features like Mischief Reef, are designed to challenge Beijing’s excessive maritime claims and affirm the rights of all nations to operate in international waters. U.S. allies such as Japan, Australia, and the United Kingdom have also joined these efforts, conducting joint naval exercises to demonstrate a unified front.
Beyond military actions, Western nations have provided diplomatic and economic support to Southeast Asian states, empowering them to resist Chinese coercion. In 2024, the G7 issued a strong statement reaffirming the importance of a free and open Indo-Pacific and condemning actions that undermine regional stability.
Statements and Resolutions from International Organizations
International organizations have also weighed in on the South China Sea dispute. ASEAN has consistently issued statements calling for peace, stability, and adherence to international law, though its language has often been cautious to avoid alienating China. The UN has refrained from taking a direct role, but its specialized tribunals, such as the PCA, have provided a legal framework for resolving disputes.
More pointedly, the European Union, NATO, and other global bodies have expressed solidarity with Southeast Asian nations, emphasizing the importance of multilateralism in addressing the South China Sea issue. Resolutions from the European Parliament and joint statements from Quad members (Australia, India, Japan, and the U.S.) have further highlighted the stakes of the dispute for global security.
A Test of Global Resolve
The South China Sea represents a litmus test for the international community’s ability to uphold the rule of law and resist unilateral aggression. For smaller claimant states, global involvement provides a critical counterweight to China’s dominance. For major powers, the dispute is part of a broader contest over the shape of the 21st-century world order—one defined by rules, not raw power. As the situation at Mischief Reef and beyond continues to evolve, the response of the international community will be pivotal in shaping the region’s future.
Case Studies and Examples: Real Encounters in the South China Sea
Scarborough Shoal Standoff (2012): A Prelude to Escalation
In 2012, China and the Philippines faced off over Scarborough Shoal when Philippine authorities attempted to arrest Chinese fishermen within the country’s EEZ. Chinese vessels intervened, leading to a weeks-long standoff that ended with China gaining control of the shoal. This incident set a precedent for China’s assertive tactics, including deploying maritime militias to reinforce claims.
Fishing Clashes: Livelihoods at Risk
The South China Sea accounts for 12% of the global fish catch, making it a critical resource. Filipino fishermen near Mischief Reef face harassment from Chinese vessels, often backed by Beijing’s maritime militia. Incidents like the 2019 ramming of a Filipino fishing boat near Recto Bank highlight the human toll of the dispute. China’s overfishing has depleted stocks, severely impacting local livelihoods in the Philippines, Vietnam, and Malaysia.
Resource Exploration: The Battle for Subsea Wealth
The South China Sea is estimated to hold 11 billion barrels of oil and 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. China’s interference has derailed Philippine energy projects, while Beijing continues unilateral drilling. These actions fuel diplomatic protests and naval confrontations, as seen in disputes with Vietnam and Malaysia.
Military Incidents and the Growing Arms Race
Mischief Reef, now a militarized artificial island, hosts runways, radars, and missile systems, making it a strategic hub for China. The U.S. and allies like Japan and Australia have responded with increased naval patrols and joint military exercises with the Philippines to counter Chinese dominance.
Impact on Local Communities
For Filipino coastal communities, the Mischief Reef dispute threatens survival. Fishing bans, harassment, and environmental degradation have destroyed coral reefs and depleted fish stocks. Many fishermen, lacking government support, are forced to fish in less productive areas, leading to financial and social hardship.
Current Situation and Future Outlook: Navigating Uncertainty in the Mischief Reef Dispute
The Current State of the Dispute
In 2025, tensions surrounding Mischief Reef in the South China Sea remain high. China has significantly increased its maritime militia presence at the reef, aiming to assert control and deter Philippine resupply missions to nearby outposts. This escalation has led to heightened confrontations between Chinese and Philippine forces, raising concerns about potential conflicts involving regional allies such as the United States.
In response, the Philippines has enacted new legislation to reaffirm its jurisdiction and resource rights in its maritime territories, including areas encompassing Mischief Reef. These moves have been met with strong protests from China, which continues to assert expansive claims over nearly the entire South China Sea.
Potential for Future Escalation
The South China Sea remains a volatile region, with the risk of miscalculation or accidental clashes increasing due to the dense presence of military and civilian vessels from multiple nations. China’s continued militarization of features like Mischief Reef, coupled with its development of new island-building technologies, suggests a potential for further escalation. The Philippines’ recent legislative actions to demarcate its maritime zones may lead to more assertive enforcement of its claims, potentially resulting in direct confrontations with Chinese forces. Additionally, the involvement of external powers conducting freedom of navigation operations in the area adds another layer of complexity to the dispute.
Pathways Toward Resolution
Despite the escalating tensions, diplomatic avenues remain crucial for de-escalation. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) continues to advocate for a legally binding Code of Conduct in the South China Sea, though progress has been slow. Confidence-building measures, such as joint resource exploration and agreements on fishing rights, could serve as initial steps toward easing tensions. International legal mechanisms, including the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling, provide a framework for resolving disputes, though enforcement remains a challenge. Greater involvement from global powers advocating for the rule of law could pressure claimant nations to adhere to international norms.
Conclusion: A Test of International Will and Resolve
The situation at Mischief Reef exemplifies the broader challenges in the South China Sea—a region where strategic interests, national pride, and international law intersect. The actions taken by China and the Philippines in recent months have heightened tensions, underscoring the need for effective diplomatic engagement and adherence to international legal frameworks. The future of Mischief Reef and the broader South China Sea will depend on the collective resolve of nations to manage their disputes peacefully and cooperatively. The international community’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring freedom of navigation will play a pivotal role in shaping the region’s stability in the years to come.
Analysis
The Philippines: A Tourism Paradise on the Rise
Centuries ago, Spanish explorers gazed upon the archipelago and called it “La Perla del Mar de Oriente”—The Pearl of the Orient Seas. A land of over 7,000 islands, shaped by fire, ocean, and history, the Philippines has always been a hidden gem in Southeast Asia. Today, this pearl is no longer hidden. With its unparalleled natural beauty, rich culture, and world-renowned hospitality, the Philippines is rapidly rising as one of the most sought-after travel destinations in the world.
From the turquoise waters of Palawan to the emerald-carved stairways of the Ifugao rice terraces, the country boasts landscapes that captivate every traveler’s heart. Palawan, often ranked among the world’s most beautiful islands, offers paradise-like beaches in El Nido and dramatic lagoons in Coron. In the northern highlands of Luzon, the Banaue Rice Terraces, carved by indigenous hands over 2,000 years ago, stand as living testaments to ancient Filipino ingenuity and harmony with nature.
Venture south and witness nature’s raw power through the perfect cone of Mount Mayon in Albay and the breathtaking crater lake of Mount Pinatubo in Central Luzon, formed from one of the most explosive eruptions of the 20th century. In the Visayas, the whimsical Chocolate Hills of Bohol roll across the landscape like a fantasy painting, each hill a geological mystery waiting to be explored.
Yet the Philippines is more than just stunning vistas. Its vibrant culture pulses through colorful festivals like Cebu’s Sinulog Festival, a street celebration of music and faith; Bacolod’s MassKara Festival, where smiling masks light up the city; and Aklan’s Ati-Atihan Festival, known as the “Mother of All Philippine Festivals.” Each celebration is a living reflection of the country’s deep-rooted traditions, resilience, and love for life.
No visit to the Philippines is complete without indulging in its flavorful cuisine. From the savory richness of adobo to the tangy comfort of sinigang, the crispy decadence of lechon to unique regional dishes, Filipino food is a delightful journey in itself. But what truly elevates every experience is the warmth of the Filipino people, known for their unmatched hospitality, genuine kindness, and the spirit of bayanihan, or community and togetherness, that leaves every visitor feeling at home.
Recognizing its immense tourism potential, the Philippine government has taken bold steps to boost the sector. The National Tourism Development Plan (NTDP) outlines strategic goals to elevate tourism’s contribution to the economy while promoting sustainability and inclusive growth. Major infrastructure investments, such as the modernization of Clark International Airport, road expansions, and the development of cruise ports in destinations like Palawan and Boracay, have made travel easier and more efficient for both domestic and international tourists.
The Department of Tourism’s globally recognized campaign, “It’s More Fun in the Philippines,” has rebranded the nation as a vibrant, welcoming, and exciting destination. Meanwhile, Tourism Enterprise Zones (TEZs) have been established to attract investors, offering incentives and strategic locations for eco-resorts, heritage towns, and adventure hubs. Public-private partnerships are also at the heart of this transformation, with collaborations fueling the rise of world-class resorts, eco-tourism projects, and community-led tourism programs.
As the world reawakens to travel, the Philippines stands ready, not just as a destination, but as an unforgettable experience. With its breathtaking nature, rich heritage, and the soul of a people who know how to welcome the world with open arms, the Philippines is not just rising, it’s soaring.
A Focus on Sustainable Tourism in the Philippines
In recent years, eco-tourism in the Philippines has surged in popularity, driven by travelers’ growing awareness of the importance of environmental conservation. The country’s pristine landscapes, rich biodiversity, and vibrant culture make it an ideal destination for those seeking to experience nature while helping to protect it. As the Philippines embraces sustainable tourism, it not only preserves its natural treasures but also sets a model for responsible tourism across the globe.
The Growing Trend of Eco-Tourism
Travelers worldwide are becoming more conscious of their environmental impact. In fact, studies show that 72% of global travelers are more likely to choose destinations and accommodations that focus on sustainability. This shift in consumer behavior is making eco-tourism an essential focus for the Philippines. As one local tour guide in Palawan, Maria, puts it, “Tourism isn’t just about seeing beautiful places; it’s about making sure these places are still here for the next generation. If we want to keep our islands thriving, we all have to do our part.”
The Philippines is home to one of the world’s most biodiverse ecosystems, with over 50,000 species of plants and animals, many of which are found nowhere else on Earth. The country’s coral reefs alone host 20% of the world’s fish species and provide livelihoods for millions of Filipinos. With such an abundance of life, it’s crucial to protect these ecosystems. “Our country’s biodiversity is not just a treasure. It’s an essential part of global health,” explains Dr. Elena Cruz, an environmental scientist working in the Philippines.
Sustainable Practices in Resorts and Tour Operations
As demand for eco-friendly travel grows, many resorts and tour operators in the Philippines are stepping up their efforts to reduce their environmental footprint. A shining example is the El Nido Resorts, which has earned multiple sustainability certifications, including LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). The resort has invested in solar panels, water recycling systems, and a comprehensive waste management program. Their general manager, Rico de la Cruz, proudly shares, “Our goal is to leave as little trace as possible. We use renewable energy to power our resorts and actively encourage our guests to minimize waste. It’s not just about luxury; it’s about responsible luxury.”
In addition to resorts, many tour operators are adopting green initiatives. A company like Island Banca Cruises in Cebu has implemented sustainable practices such as using biodegradable products and ensuring that all waste from their boats is properly managed. “We teach our guests the importance of keeping the waters clean, and we’ve seen a huge improvement in both the guests’ experiences and the environment,” says the company’s founder, Jose Ramirez.
Community-Based Tourism: Empowering Locals and Preserving Culture
Sustainable tourism also goes hand-in-hand with cultural preservation, and community-based tourism is playing an increasingly important role. In places like Palawan’s Taytay, indigenous communities are running eco-tourism initiatives that provide cultural experiences while maintaining environmental conservation efforts. “We welcome tourists, but we ensure that they respect our land, culture, and traditions,” says Lila, a local guide. “In return, our community benefits from the income, which we reinvest in projects that protect our environment.”
According to the Philippine Statistics Authority, eco-tourism has become one of the fastest-growing sectors of the local economy, contributing almost 10% to the country’s GDP. In regions where community-based eco-tourism thrives, locals are able to preserve their cultural heritage while benefiting economically. This model has brought sustainable development to rural areas that would otherwise have limited access to resources.
NGOs and Local Organizations: Key Players in Sustainable Tourism
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and local organizations play a pivotal role in pushing the sustainable tourism agenda. The Philippine Business for Social Progress (PBSP) has been actively working with communities to help them create eco-tourism initiatives that generate income while protecting the environment. “We’re helping communities shift from overexploitation of resources to practices that are sustainable and rewarding for the future,” says PBSP’s Executive Director, Maria Lopez.
These organizations also work in tandem with the government to enforce regulations and monitor the health of ecosystems. “It’s all about creating a balance between economic growth and environmental preservation,” says Tourism Secretary Bernadette Romulo-Puyat. “We are building the future of tourism on sustainable principles.”
Conserving Marine Life: A National Priority
The Philippines is home to some of the world’s most impressive marine biodiversity, and protecting these ecosystems is crucial. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) like Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park and Apo Reef Natural Park are key to preserving the country’s coral reefs and marine life. Tubbataha, a UNESCO World Heritage site, is known for its 30% higher fish biomass compared to unprotected areas. “These marine reserves are vital not only for the Philippines but for the entire planet,” says marine biologist Dr. Victoriano Garcia. “They serve as the breeding grounds for fish populations that sustain the global seafood supply.”
Efforts to combat plastic pollution are also underway. The Philippines generates 2.7 million tons of plastic waste every year, and much of it ends up in the ocean. To address this, the government and local NGOs are leading initiatives to promote plastic-free tourism. Dive shops in places like Boracay and Palawan have implemented strict “no plastic” policies for tourists, and more and more resorts are using eco-friendly materials.
Local organizations are also tackling issues like overfishing and irresponsible tourism practices. “We’ve seen great progress in educating both locals and visitors,” says Juanito Delgado, a local dive instructor in Donsol, Sorsogon. “By working together, we can preserve our natural resources for generations to come.”
Protecting Endangered Species
One of the Philippines’ most iconic conservation successes has been the protection of whale sharks in Donsol. Through careful management and responsible tourism practices, the area has become a model for sustainable wildlife tourism. In 2019, the region saw over 14,000 whale shark sightings, contributing $1.7 million to the local economy. “We have strict guidelines for tourists to follow. The goal is to protect the whale sharks, not disrupt them,” says local conservationist, Carmen Salazar.
In addition, sea turtles in places like Palawan and Bohol are being protected through turtle sanctuaries and monitoring programs. These efforts are critical to ensuring the survival of endangered species and keeping their populations healthy.
As the Philippines continues to grow as a leading destination for eco-tourism, the future of its stunning landscapes, diverse wildlife, and cultural heritage depends on the collective efforts of the government, local communities, tourists, and conservation organizations. By embracing sustainable tourism, the Philippines is ensuring that its natural wonders will remain vibrant for generations to come, offering a unique and responsible travel experience for all who visit.
“Tourism can be a force for good,” concludes Dr. Cruz. “If done right, it can support communities, protect the environment, and preserve the cultures that make the Philippines so special.”
Emerging Destinations and Experiences in the Philippines
The Philippines is no longer just about its famous islands; lesser-known spots are rising as the next big tourism destinations. From Romblon’s pristine beaches to Tawi-Tawi’s cultural richness, these hidden gems offer a unique, untapped charm. Romblon, known for its marble industry, and Siquijor, famed for its mystical allure, are rapidly gaining traction for their tranquility. Camiguin, with its volcanic landscapes, and Tawi-Tawi, showcasing unique seascapes and cultures, are perfect for the adventurous traveler seeking something off the beaten path.
Adventure Tourism: Thrills Await
The Philippines is a haven for adrenaline junkies. Tubbataha Reefs, Apo Island, and Coron Bay offer world-class diving, while Siargao and La Union are surf havens for riders of all levels. Hiking trails like Mount Apo and Mount Pulag reward trekkers with spectacular views, and Kawasan Falls in Cebu is a canyoneering hotspot. “It’s all about pushing boundaries and immersing yourself in nature,” says local guide Ryan Cruz.
Innovative Tourism Experiences
More than just sights, the Philippines offers cultural immersion with the Ifugao and T’boli communities, where travelers can learn ancient traditions. Farm-to-table dining in Tagaytay and Davao celebrates local flavors, while wellness retreats featuring traditional healing like Hilot offer relaxation. For those into history, dark tourism sites such as Corregidor Island and Bataan provide a sobering look at the Philippines’ WWII past.
These emerging destinations and experiences show how the Philippines is evolving into a diverse tourism hub, catering to every type of traveler while remaining rooted in its cultural heritage and natural beauty.
Harnessing Technology for a Seamless Experience in Philippine Tourism Digital Travel Planning and Mobile Apps
Mobile apps and digital travel planning tools have revolutionized how tourists explore the Philippines. Apps like Klook and Traveloka allow travelers to easily book accommodations, activities, and tours with just a few clicks. They also provide real-time information on destinations, local attractions, and recommendations based on user preferences. “These apps help visitors plan their trips efficiently and maximize their time in the country,” says tech expert Sarah Lim.
https://indopacificreport.com/2025/03/20/china-restricts-philippine-flights/
Virtual and Augmented Reality Enhancements
Virtual reality (VR) is transforming how travelers preview destinations. VR tours of historical sites like Intramuros and natural wonders like Taal Volcano give travelers a glimpse of what to expect before their visit. Additionally, augmented reality (AR) is being used at landmarks such as Rizal Park, where visitors can access historical context and interactive displays using their smartphones, enhancing their on-site experience.
Smart Cities and Mobile Payments
The Philippines is increasingly embracing smart city technologies to improve tourist convenience. Cities like Davao and Metro Manila are incorporating smart systems to enhance transportation, safety, and overall ease of travel. Real-time traffic updates, smart lighting, and free Wi-Fi in public spaces contribute to a seamless visitor experience. Alongside this, mobile payment systems like GCash and PayMaya have made cashless transactions common in hotels, restaurants, and shops. “Using mobile payments has streamlined transactions, making it more convenient for tourists and locals alike,” says finance expert, Mark Perez.
Cashless Transactions and Online Bookings
The shift to cashless transactions is further bolstered by the rise of online booking platforms. Websites like Booking.com, Agoda, and Airbnb make booking flights, accommodations, and tours easier than ever. Tourists no longer need to carry large amounts of cash, as most destinations accept digital payments, whether for hotel bookings or souvenir purchases. “Online platforms have made travel more accessible, offering everything in one place, from flights to local experiences,” adds travel blogger Anne Torres.
Technology is reshaping how tourists experience the Philippines, making travel more efficient, interactive, and convenient. Whether through mobile apps, VR previews, or smart city initiatives, these innovations promise a more seamless and enjoyable journey for every visitor.
The Future is Bright: Investing in Philippine Tourism
The Philippine tourism industry holds immense promise for the future, with its natural beauty, rich cultural heritage, and warm hospitality being key factors that set it apart on the global tourism stage. As international travel rebounds, the country’s unique charm continues to attract millions of visitors each year. With the right investments and strategic initiatives, the Philippines is poised for long-term growth and success in the tourism sector.
Competitive Advantages for Growth
The Philippines is an unrivaled destination thanks to its 7,641 islands offering pristine beaches, lush forests, and spectacular dive sites. The country’s cultural heritage, from UNESCO World Heritage sites like Banaue Rice Terraces to vibrant festivals like Sinulog, makes it an alluring destination for those seeking not just leisure but a deep dive into history and tradition. As travel trends shift toward more personalized, authentic experiences, the Philippines stands ready to cater to a global audience eager for meaningful travel.
Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
With the rise of eco-conscious travelers, the Philippines has the opportunity to lead in sustainable tourism. Initiatives focused on environmental conservation and community-based tourism can ensure that growth benefits both the local population and the environment. By embracing green practices, local communities can thrive, preserving the very landscapes and traditions that make the Philippines unique. The National Tourism Development Plan (NTDP) sets the stage for such growth by ensuring tourism developments benefit the entire country, focusing on local empowerment and preservation.
Catering to Niche Markets
The demand for experiential travel is on the rise, and the Philippines is perfectly positioned to meet these needs. Tourists are no longer satisfied with generic vacations; they seek cultural immersion and authentic interactions with local communities. Whether it’s exploring the culinary delights of Davao, embarking on wellness retreats in Batangas, or experiencing adventure tourism through surfing in Siargao or hiking Mount Pulag, the Philippines can cater to a wide range of niche markets. This diversification can help attract various traveler types and ensure sustained growth in the tourism sector.
A Call to Action
The future of Philippine tourism is bright, and we encourage everyone to explore its diverse destinations, from hidden islands to world-class diving spots, historic towns to lush mountains. As travelers, it’s crucial to adopt responsible and sustainable travel practices to help preserve these treasures for future generations. By supporting local businesses and communities, tourists can play an active role in fostering economic growth and environmental conservation. The Philippines’ tourism sector is not just about visiting; it’s about creating positive, lasting impacts that enrich both visitors and locals.
Let’s help the Philippines shine as a beacon of sustainable tourism and cultural pride, travel with purpose, respect, and awareness!
Analysis
Can Trump Really Stop Iran’s Nuclear Plan Without a War?
The Current Issue:
The United States and Iran are preparing for high-stakes diplomatic talks this Saturday in Oman, aiming to address Tehran’s fast-moving nuclear program. While President Donald Trump has touted the meeting as a significant opportunity—and has not ruled out military action if diplomacy fails— the talks will be indirect and mediated by Oman’s foreign minister. This disconnect highlights the entrenched mistrust between the two nations. The urgency is real: Iran now possesses uranium enriched to 60%, alarmingly close to weapons-grade levels. With regional instability surging due to the Gaza conflict and tensions with Israeli-aligned forces, Washington views the talks as a chance to box in Iran’s nuclear capabilities before things spiral out of control. Trump, looking to clear this hurdle and focus on broader regional deals like Israel-Saudi normalization, appears eager to strike a deal swiftly.
The Historical Backdrop:
Much of the current tension can be traced back to Trump’s 2018 decision to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement, known as the JCPOA. That deal, forged under President Obama, was designed to limit Iran’s nuclear enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump criticized it as weak, arguing it ignored Iran’s ballistic missile development and regional proxy activity. Since the U.S. exit, Iran has gradually dismantled its compliance, enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels and shrinking its nuclear “breakout” time to just weeks. Attempts by the Biden administration to revive the deal failed, and now Trump—having returned to office—appears to be in a stronger position to negotiate, with Iran reeling from economic strain, military setbacks, and domestic unrest.
The Possible Outcome:
The stakes are immense. Trump has warned Iran of “bombing the likes of which they have never seen” if a deal isn’t reached, while also suggesting Israel would take the lead in any military action. Tehran, while defiant, is clearly feeling the pressure, and appears willing to consider limited concessions for sanctions relief and a chance to regroup. However, a maximalist “Libya-style” disarmament deal—favored by Israel—is a red line for Iran, which sees it as a recipe for regime collapse. A more realistic outcome could involve a time-bound freeze on uranium enrichment, verification measures, and modest U.S. sanctions relief. Such a deal wouldn’t be comprehensive, but it might serve as a stopgap to prevent further escalation and buy time for both sides.
https://indopacificreport.com/2024/04/15/irans-unprecedented-attack-on-israel-shocked-entire-world/
The Probable Way Out:
A diplomatic resolution—though challenging—is still within reach. Both Trump and Iran have strong incentives to make a deal: Trump wants to showcase foreign policy wins and clear the regional file, while Iran’s leadership is desperate for economic breathing room. The looming expiration of the U.N. sanctions snapback mechanism in October, and the need to initiate the process by July, adds additional urgency. A pragmatic approach would involve indirect talks culminating in a phased agreement, one that restricts Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for targeted economic relief. Crucially, both sides would need to abandon zero-sum thinking and embrace a “less than perfect” deal. It may not solve the broader U.S.-Iran rivalry, but it could defuse the immediate crisis—and that, for now, might be enough.
Analysis
$5.6 Billion F-16 Deal: Why the Philippines’ Air Force Is Now Really a Regional Game-Changer?
It begins with the roar of afterburners echoing across the skies of Luzon.
April 2025. The sun rises over the Philippine archipelago, marking the dawn of an era defined by renewed national strength and sovereignty. Over 1,700 dedicated military personnel, more than 20 advanced fighter aircraft, and the resounding thunder of jet engines herald Cope Thunder 25-1—not merely an international air exercise but a bold proclamation of national revival and strategic intent.
At the strategic core of this transformation is the U.S. government’s approval to sell 20 F-16 fighter jets to the Philippines, a deal valued at $5.6 billion that transcends a conventional arms transfer. This decision reflects a deep commitment to modernizing defense capabilities amid escalating pressures in the South China Sea. With 79% of a projected $5.1 billion aircraft procurement budget now allocated for combat aircraft acquisitions over the next decade, the Philippine Air Force (PAF) is emerging as a formidable force capable of safeguarding sovereignty and influencing the security dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
GlobalData’s Aerospace & Defense Analyst Udayini Aakunoor encapsulates the mission succinctly: “Amid the rising geopolitical tensions in the South China Sea, the F-16s will act as both sword and shield.” These battle-proven, NATO-compatible aircraft, equipped with precision-guided munitions and cutting-edge avionics, are set to enable relentless deterrent patrols and rapid interceptions of airspace intrusions. This modernization effort, integral to the Horizon 3 military upgrade program, is further bolstered by strategic partnerships such as the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) and reinforced through regular joint exercises like Balikatan.
The revival of Cope Thunder, enhanced this year with its inaugural International Observer Program, has transformed the skies into a stage for regional solidarity and mutual learning. Observers from Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, and Japan now converge to witness firsthand the evolution of a force determined to secure not only national airspace but also the broader stability of a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Since its establishment in 1947, the Philippine Air Force has borne the weighty responsibility of defending a vast and geographically diverse archipelago, supporting ground and naval operations, and providing humanitarian assistance during natural calamities. Historically constrained by limited resources and aging equipment, the PAF has faced significant operational challenges. However, with the changing strategic environment and emerging threats in the South China Sea, the force has embarked on a path of unprecedented modernization. Under the Revised AFP Modernization Program, advancements include the acquisition of state-of-the-art trainer jets, attack helicopters, surveillance platforms, and sophisticated air defense systems—all aimed at recalibrating mission capability to meet contemporary challenges.
The F-16 acquisition, representing a $5.6 billion investment, signals the transition from legacy platforms to a modern, interoperable, and intrinsically robust air power. Coupled with strengthened defense alliances with partners such as the United States and the rigorous conduct of joint exercises, the PAF now stands as a vigilant guardian of national airspace and a pivotal force in maintaining a stable and prosperous region.
This strategic realignment transcends mere hardware upgrades. It embodies long-term national aspirations for self-reliance, regional influence, and the preservation of historical heritage. The skies over the Philippines now serve as both a battleground and a canvas, illustrating a resolute commitment to secure a future that honors a proud past and vibrant national aspirations.
Evolution of the Philippine Air Force
Born in 1947 from the remnants of the Philippine Army Air Corps and the crucible of World War II, the PAF emerged in the wake of conflict with a profound sense of duty and an indomitable spirit. Early Filipino pilots, flying aircraft as modest as the P-26 Peashooter, were not only combatants but symbols of national determination—a determination that later evolved amid internal struggles like the Hukbalahap insurgency, when the air force was forced to fight on multiple fronts with limited resources and a deep reliance on American military aid.
During the Cold War, the American presence in Clark and Subic Bay transformed the PAF into an air arm more capable of meeting the strategic demands of the era. With the arrival of modern jet fighters like the F-86 Sabre and T-33, the air force was rapidly integrated into the broader U.S. defense strategy in the region. Yet, even as it absorbed these advanced technologies, the PAF’s primary focus remained on internal security and counterinsurgency. This period was marked by a dual legacy: one that underscored the benefits of close U.S. military cooperation and another that highlighted the inherent vulnerabilities of a force still grappling with doctrinal and operational challenges rooted in its formative years.
The closure of U.S. bases in 1991 signified not merely the end of an era but exposed the fragilities of a military institution that had long depended on external support. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, the PAF’s aging fleet became emblematic of a broader struggle: a nation caught between limited resources and an escalating regional security dilemma, as China steadily expanded its influence in the South China Sea. Despite these setbacks, the Philippine Air Force maintained a persistent commitment to defending the nation’s skies—a commitment that continues to inspire efforts toward modernization and strategic renewal.
Modernization Efforts of the Philippine Air Force
For decades, the Philippine Air Force (PAF) operated with aging aircraft and minimal deterrence capabilities, relying on hand-me-downs and limited defense spending. By the early 2010s, the situation had become dire, there were no operational fighter jets in the fleet. This left the country vulnerable, especially with the increasing frequency of Chinese incursions into the West Philippine Sea. These realities spurred a nationwide call to action, culminating in the launch of the Revised Armed Forces of the Philippines Modernization Program (RAFPMP), a long-term plan to rebuild and upgrade military capabilities in three stages: Horizon 1 (2013–2017), Horizon 2 (2018–2022), and Horizon 3 (2023–2028).
A cornerstone of the modernization drive was the acquisition of new combat aircraft. In 2014, the PAF struck a $420 million deal with South Korea’s Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) for 12 FA-50PH “Golden Eagle” light fighter jets. These aircraft can reach Mach 1.5, and are armed with laser- and radar-guided munitions, making them capable of performing both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. Though classified as light fighters, the FA-50s have given the PAF a much-needed tactical advantage, enabling pilots to train, patrol, and defend Philippine airspace more effectively.
Beyond fighters, the PAF also invested in expanding its support and transport capabilities. It acquired 16 S-70i Black Hawk helicopters from Poland, used for both troop movement and humanitarian missions. These were complemented by a growing fleet of C-130 Hercules for heavy lift and Airbus C-295M aircraft for medium-range transport. The PAF also added Bell 412EPs and Super Tucano A-29Bs, bolstering both versatility and firepower in internal security and close air support roles.
Maritime domain awareness has become another key pillar of modernization. The PAF has deployed Gulfstream G280 command aircraft, light lift NC212i aircraft, and a growing inventory of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. These assets are critical in monitoring the vast Philippine coastline, especially amid rising tensions in the South China Sea. Long-range ground radar systems and enhanced ISR coverage now offer better early warning and response coordination.
As of early 2025, the Philippine Air Force operates a revitalized inventory: 12 FA-50PH fighters, 5 C-130 Hercules, 7 C-295Ms, 16 S-70i Black Hawks, 8 Bell 412EPs, 4 Super Tucanos, and 2 Gulfstream G280s for command missions. In terms of manpower, the PAF has grown to over 17,000 active personnel, with a significant focus on training through simulation programs and international military exercises like Balikatan, Cope Thunder, and engagements with ASEAN partners.
Despite these gains, challenges remain. The PAF still lacks true multirole 4th-generation fighters, with hopes pinned on the approved $5.6 billion F-16 acquisition deal with the United States. It also lacks robust air defense and missile deterrence systems, and maritime patrol capabilities remain stretched thin for an archipelago of over 7,600 islands. Nevertheless, the modernization program has transformed the PAF from a grounded force into an emerging air power, committed to defending national sovereignty and supporting regional stability in the Indo-Pacific.
The F-16 Acquisition
In the face of escalating maritime disputes and regional power plays, the Philippine Air Force is on the verge of a generational leap. At the heart of this transformation is the proposed acquisition of 20 F-16 Fighting Falcons, the most advanced combat aircraft the PAF has ever pursued. The deal, approved by the US government and valued at approximately $5.58 billion, includes 16 F-16C single-seat fighters and 4 F-16D two-seaters, all in the Block 70/72 configuration, the most modern variant available for export.
The package goes beyond the airframes. It includes cutting-edge systems like the AN/APG-83 SABR AESA radar, providing high-resolution targeting even in cluttered environments. The AN/AAQ-33 Sniper Advanced Targeting Pod allows laser-guided precision bombing and long-range target tracking. Electronic warfare is covered by the AN/ALQ-254 Viper Shield, capable of jamming threats and spoofing enemy radar. The weapons suite features AIM-120 AMRAAMs, AIM-9X Sidewinders, GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs, Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs), and Mk 82/84 general-purpose bombs, all US and NATO-standard, ensuring full interoperability in multinational operations.
https://indopacificreport.com/2025/03/27/who-dares-to-challenge-beijing/
Strategically, this acquisition does more than upgrade aircraft, it redefines the Philippines’ defense posture. For the first time in over four decades, the country will have a fleet capable of true air superiority and deep strike missions. It sends a clear signal to rivals and allies alike: the Philippines is no longer a passive observer in the Indo-Pacific, it’s building a credible deterrent. The move also deepens ties under the US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty, boosting combined force readiness through exercises like Cope Thunder and Balikatan, where these F-16s will seamlessly integrate with allied aircraft.
Of course, the price tag, $5.58 billion, raises eyebrows in a developing economy. To manage this, proposals are on the table for long-term US foreign military financing (FMF), including favorable loan terms and possibly phased delivery schedules. This acquisition may be the largest in Philippine military history, but it’s also seen as an investment in national survival, regional stability, and a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Challenges and Future Outlook
The acquisition of F-16s represents a pivotal leap forward for the Philippine Air Force, yet challenges remain in evolving a modest fleet into a formidable deterrent—challenges underscored when contrasted with China’s overwhelming air power and the deep capabilities provided by allied support as a force multiplier. China’s air power, with an inventory surpassing 3,300 aircraft—including 1,212 fighter jets and advanced stealth platforms such as the J-20—illustrates not only numerical superiority but also a significant technological advantage in drone systems, electronic warfare, and fifth-generation fighters. In stark contrast, the Philippines maintains a modest fleet of just over 200 aircraft, without dedicated fighter jets, and historically depends on allies for strategic air defense and deterrence.
Integrating the advanced F-16s into the existing force structure demands a comprehensive transformation. This process involves overhauling logistics, modernizing air doctrine, and establishing rigorous training regimes for pilots and ground crews. The transition to operating fourth-generation fighters upgraded with fifth-generation capabilities require sophisticated technical instruction, extensive foreign exchange programs, and long-term investments in local expertise. Furthermore, the financial commitments for fuel, spare parts, software upgrades, and supporting infrastructure present substantial sustainment challenges that must be meticulously balanced against broader developmental priorities.
The outlook, however, remains cautiously optimistic. The F-16 acquisition is envisioned as a foundational launchpad within the broader Horizon 3 modernization program that anticipates the procurement of additional multirole fighters, advanced surveillance platforms, and cutting-edge drones. Regional security dynamics intensify the need for comprehensive maritime domain awareness and enhanced interoperability during joint operations. Here, the concept of a force multiplier is integral, as the coordinated capabilities of the Philippines’ allies substantially enhance overall regional deterrence and collective response capacity. For instance, the United States contributes an air force of over 13,000 aircraft—including advanced stealth fighters like the F-22 and F-35—while Japan and South Korea complement these assets with modern fighters and innovative platforms such as the KF-21 and F-35.
Each incremental upgrade and strategic reform in the Philippine Air Force serves as a potent affirmation of national resolve and contributes to building an agile, interoperable air power. By leveraging these allied capabilities as force multipliers, the Philippines is better positioned to safeguard its airspace, support allied missions, and assert its territorial sovereignty in an increasingly complex and contested Indo-Pacific region.
What If China Restricts Philippine Flights in the South China Sea?
The Philippines: A Tourism Paradise on the Rise
Can Trump Really Stop Iran’s Nuclear Plan Without a War?
$5.6 Billion F-16 Deal: Why the Philippines’ Air Force Is Now Really a Regional Game-Changer?
How strong is the Philippine Navy in 2025?
Who Dares to Challenge Beijing in the South China Sea?
Why BRP Sierra Madre is important for the Philippines?
What are the Most Pressing Challenges for the Philippines in 2024?
Why the Indo-Pacific Region is Important to the World in the 21st Century?
How China has established it Dash Line Claims of South China Sea over time?
Why Philippines tourism is facing Challenges?
Why Indo-Pacific is Important?
Philippines and Germany to Reach Defense Cooperation Agreement this Year
How the Philippines became trusted Partner of the United States?
Is China’s South China Sea Reef Swarming a Power Keg for War?
How Indonesia’s New Capital will Change its Outlook?
Geo-Politics1 year agoWhy BRP Sierra Madre is important for the Philippines?
- Geo-Politics1 year ago
What are the Most Pressing Challenges for the Philippines in 2024?
-
Geo-Politics1 year agoWhy the Indo-Pacific Region is Important to the World in the 21st Century?
- Geo-Politics1 year ago
How China has established it Dash Line Claims of South China Sea over time?
- Geo-Strategy1 year ago
Why Philippines tourism is facing Challenges?
- Geo-Politics1 year ago
Can Philippines, Taiwan, Japan and South Korea Join Forces Against China?
- Geo-Politics1 year ago
How Strong are the Philippines Armed Forces?
- Geo-Politics1 year ago
Philippines and China Trade Blames on each other over collusion of ships in the South China Sea
