Connect with us

Geo-Economics

What is the Future of Afghanistan?

What is the Future of Afghanistan

Introduction

Afghanistan’s tumultuous history, from serving as a buffer state in the Great Game to enduring the Soviet invasion and the rise of the Taliban, has shaped its present challenges and uncertain future. Covering a vast territory with a population in dire need, Afghanistan relies heavily on agriculture and possesses rich natural resources yet struggles with economic instability exacerbated by recent political upheavals. Its water resources, vital for sustenance, are shared with neighboring countries. In the wake of the Taliban’s resurgence, the nation faces profound questions regarding governance, stability, and human rights, while international engagement remains uncertain. As Afghanistan stands at a critical crossroads, its path forward hinges on addressing security concerns, upholding human rights, fostering diplomatic relations, and rebuilding its economy and infrastructure to ensure the well-being of its populace in the years to come.

Current Economic woes of Afghanistan

Afghanistan’s economy, already fragile and heavily reliant on foreign aid, faces a dire challenge exacerbated by the Taliban’s takeover of Kabul. With approximately 40% of its GDP sourced from international aid, the suspension of foreign aid and freezing of Da Afghanistan Bank’s reserves, primarily held in the US totaling around $9 billion, sent shockwaves through the country. The internal banking system froze, leaving citizens stranded in long queues outside banks and non-functioning ATMs, amplifying desperation as cash became scarce. Landlords, fearing Taliban seizures, even allowed tenants to stay rent-free. Meanwhile, Afghanistan witnessed a mass exodus as people flocked to the airport, seeking refuge from Taliban rule, further intensifying the humanitarian crisis amid economic instability and insecurity. Despite claims that the Taliban could sustain themselves through illicit means like mining, opium production, or trade, such revenue sources, while significant during the insurgency, proved insufficient for governing effectively. Additionally, remittances from abroad, constituting 4% of the GDP, provided a lifeline amidst economic contraction and widespread deprivation, as the nation grappled with a daunting “new normal.”

Before we begin our analysis, “What does the future hold for Afghanistan?” Let’s dive into some historical perspective of the Afghan conundrum.

Historical Perspective of Afghanistan

 Afghanistan’s history is replete with wars and conflicts. In the late 19th century, the Great Game unfolded as Russia and Great Britain vied for control over Afghanistan, highlighting the nation’s strategic significance. Despite British efforts, Afghanistan became independent in 1919, underlining its historical resistance to external influence. However, the Soviet invasion in 1979 thrust Afghanistan into another tumultuous era, triggering a prolonged conflict with far-reaching consequences. If one wants to analyze the future of the country, its history provides a rich set of experiences and possible lessons for the country’s most recent transition.

The First Phase: The Saur Revolution and Soviet Occupation

Before the 1978 civil war, Afghanistan functioned as a monarchy under Muhammad Zahir Shah, who ascended to power in 1933. In the post-World War II era, the U.S. and the Soviet Union competed for influence in the region, with the U.S. establishing military ties with Pakistan in 1954, prompting Afghanistan to increasingly lean towards Soviet support. Despite convening a Loya Jirga in 1964 to discuss a draft constitution, Zahir Shah retained power, allowing political parties to organize but not compete in elections. His rule ended in 1973 when his cousin Daoud Khan, aligned with the Parcham faction of the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA), overthrew him. Daoud’s subsequent marginalization of Parchamis and distancing from the Soviet Union led to a reunion of PDPA factions in 1977, culminating in a coup in 1978. The Soviet Union intervened in December 1979, installing Babrak Karmal as president and initiating a brutal occupation marked by mass repression, torture, and executions. The conflict, which claimed about a million Afghan lives and displaced five million refugees, became a focal point of the Cold War, with the U.S. and Saudi Arabia providing significant support to the Afghan resistance, including Islamist radicals like Osama bin Laden, turning Afghanistan into a battleground shaped by external powers.

Advertisement

The Second Phase: From the Geneva Accords to the Mujahidin’s Civil War

The culmination of negotiations to end the war occurred with the signing of the 1988 Geneva Accords, a key element being the Soviet Union’s commitment to withdraw all uniformed troops by February 1989. Despite considerable Soviet assistance, the communist government managed to retain power until early 1992. During this period, the United Nations struggled to establish a transitional process acceptable to all parties, but these efforts proved futile. The U.S. and its allies suspended further peace process initiatives until the rise of the Taliban. While the UN’s engagement with Afghanistan persisted, the lack of international commitment hindered progress. Donor countries, including the U.S., supported relief efforts, but ongoing war, donor fatigue, and the need to address other humanitarian crises left Afghanistan’s aid initiatives consistently underfunded. In early 1992, a coalition named the Northern Alliance, comprising forces led by Tajik leader Ahmed Shah Massoud, Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum, and the Hazara faction emerged. This coalition took control of Kabul, preventing President Najibullah from leaving the country and derailing the UN transition. Despite internal conflicts, the Northern Alliance reached a coalition agreement on April 25, excluding Hizb-i Islami led by Gulbuddin Hikmatyar. In June 1992, Burhanuddin Rabbani assumed the presidency of the Islamic State of Afghanistan (ISA), further escalating the conflict as Hikmatyar bombarded Kabul with rockets. Subsequent infighting led to widespread abductions and civilian casualties. In January 1994, Hikmatyar allied with Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum to oust Rabbani and Ahmad Shah Massoud, instigating a full-scale civil war in Kabul. By 1995, a third of the city lay in ruins, and the conflict claimed thousands of lives, primarily due to rocket and artillery attacks.

The Third Phase: The Taliban’s Conquest of Afghanistan

During this period, Afghanistan experienced a fragmentation of power as various factions asserted control, leading to the emergence of local warlords and posing frequent challenges to humanitarian agencies operating in the country. The Taliban, composed of disillusioned former mujahidin, rallied around Mullah Mohammad Omar with the aim of restoring stability and imposing Islamic law. Pakistan’s support for the Taliban grew, recognizing strategic benefits by October 1994, and the Taliban’s capture of Herat in September 1995 severed the land route to Iran. Subsequently, the Taliban seized Kabul in September 1996, prompting the retreat of forces led by Massoud. The return of Osama bin Laden further strengthened the Taliban’s position, resulting in the renaming of the country to the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan by 1997. Under Taliban rule, strict Islamic law was enforced, leading to severe restrictions on women and the establishment of a moral behavior agency. Efforts to expand control northward sparked conflicts with Dostum’s mini-state, particularly in Mazar-i Sharif, where an alliance dissolution led to significant Taliban casualties. In response, the United Front, opposing the Taliban, emerged. The U.S. initiated strikes against bin Laden’s camps in August 1998, and the UN imposed sanctions on the Taliban in October 1999 for failing to extradite bin Laden. Conflict persisted through 2000 and 2001, culminating in Massoud’s assassination on September 9, 2001, just prior to the September 11 attacks. With Massoud’s death, the United Front encountered significant challenges in its post-September 11 landscape.

 The Fourth Phase: 9/11 Saga and the US Policy towards Afghanistan

The trajectory of the United States’ involvement in Afghanistan, spanning four presidencies from George W. Bush to Joe Biden, has been characterized by a series of strategic shifts, failures, and unresolved challenges. President Bush’s declaration of the ‘War on Terror’ following the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, led to a swift military intervention aimed at dismantling al-Qaeda and ousting the Taliban regime that harbored them. However, the subsequent nation-building efforts faced numerous obstacles, including the resurgence of the Taliban and the inability to establish stable governance structures. Despite initial military successes, the US encountered difficulties in achieving its long-term objectives, with subsequent administrations grappling with the complexities of the Afghan conflict.

The Bush administration’s focus on military action and the establishment of a Weberian democracy encountered significant challenges as the Taliban adapted to local conditions and employed insurgency tactics learned from the Iraqi theater. The lack of attention to local socio-cultural dynamics and the failure to address underlying grievances allowed the Taliban to regain strength and support among segments of the Afghan population disaffected by government corruption and social services deficiencies. Additionally, the US military effort in Iraq diverted resources and attention away from Afghanistan, further complicating the stabilization efforts.

Advertisement

President Obama’s Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy sought to stabilize both Afghanistan and Pakistan by recognizing the interconnected nature of the conflict and the importance of addressing terrorism emanating from the region. However, the insurgency persisted, exacerbated by instability in Pakistan’s tribal regions, where al-Qaeda found sanctuary. Efforts to strengthen Pakistan’s military and economy were hindered by ongoing security challenges and political tensions in Pakistan.

The Trump administration’s engagement with the Taliban marked a departure from previous approaches, culminating in the signing of a historic peace accord in Doha in 2020. However, the agreement faced criticism for its perceived concessions to the Taliban and the exclusion of the Afghan government from key negotiations. Despite initial optimism, intra-Afghan talks faltered, highlighting deep-seated divisions and the complexities of achieving a sustainable peace settlement.

Ultimately, the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021 under the Biden administration precipitated the collapse of the Afghan government and the return of Taliban rule, sparked international condemnation and scrutiny. The United States’ long-drawn-out involvement in Afghanistan underscored the challenges of nation-building in conflict zones and the limitations of military solutions in addressing complex political and social dynamics. The failure to achieve a lasting peace settlement highlights the need for a comprehensive, multilateral approach that addresses the root causes of conflict and promotes inclusive governance and development initiatives.

Internal Dynamics

Taliban’s Governance

Following the Taliban’s swift resurgence to power in August 2021, apprehensions about a return to their harsh governance of the 1990s have materialized over the past years. Despite assurances of moderation and reforms from certain Taliban factions, the group has largely adhered to draconian policies, marginalizing women from public life and suppressing dissent. A formal governance structure is yet to be established, with the interim cabinet appointed early in their tenure remaining unchanged. The reimplementation of stringent measures has underscored the Taliban’s authoritarian stance, raising concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and human rights.

The Taliban’s efforts to integrate fighters into formal state security roles have encountered significant challenges, particularly in remote regions where fighters lack formal training to serve people. In urban areas, former combatants have assumed roles in law enforcement and civil service offices, despite their limited experience in urban governance over the past two decades. Managing diverse urban populations and regions with non-Pashtun ethnic communities has proven challenging, with the Taliban struggling to protect historically marginalized groups. The group faces internal threats from the local Islamic State branch and external resistance from areas opposed to Taliban rule, leading to invasive raids and reports of extrajudicial killings targeting former security personnel and perceived dissidents.

Advertisement

Likewise, the Taliban leadership remains predominantly Pashtun, discontent among minority communities seeking representation has surfaced, fueled by perceptions of ethnic favoritism and militarized crackdowns. Instances of popular unrest, such as those witnessed in the northern majority Uzbek province of Faryab in January 2022, underscore the challenges being faced by the Taliban in building inclusive governance structures. Despite attempts to engage with local stakeholders, the Taliban’s outreach efforts have yielded mixed results, highlighting the complexities of governing a diverse and fragmented society in the wake of ongoing security threats and internal divisions.

Economic Mismanagement by the Taliban

William Byrd, an advisor at the United States Institute of Peace, delved into Afghanistan’s economic landscape, one year after the Taliban assumed power, thereby addressing key aspects of economic management, humanitarian concerns, aid prospects, and priorities for global stakeholders. According to Byrd, following the Taliban’s ascendancy in August 2021, Afghanistan’s economy drastically contracted by 20% to 30%, which led to widespread unemployment, diminished social services, and a deepening humanitarian crisis. The situation of hundreds of thousands, coupled with business closures and plummeting investments, exacerbated the crisis, leaving a significant portion of the population vulnerable to poverty, food insecurity, and disease prevalence. While signs of stabilization have emerged, economic recovery to pre-2021 levels remains elusive, with the country grappling with the enduring impacts of the collapse.

Internally, Afghan businesses have managed to avert further closures, although operating at levels well below those before 2021. Although goods remain available and wage rates have steadied, inflation persists due to increasing food and energy prices. Mining activities, notably coal exports to Pakistan, have shown modest growth, offering some respite amidst economic turmoil. Nevertheless, the prevailing situation remains dire, with an estimated 70% of the populace unable to meet basic needs, perpetuating a state of “famine equilibrium” necessitating sustained humanitarian intervention.

The Taliban’s efforts to secure international legitimacy have encountered obstacles, including asset freezes by Western nations, the suspension of IMF access, and the cessation of World Bank funding, complicating the group’s diplomatic recognition and access to essential resources. While the Taliban has sought acceptance through its UN General Assembly appeal, promising inclusivity and respect for human rights, concerns persist regarding its adherence to international norms, particularly regarding women’s rights. Additionally, the complexities of international recognition are compounded by reservations from regional powers such as Russia, China, Iran, and Pakistan, which, despite initial openness, remain wary of the Taliban’s governance, impeding explicit endorsement.

Afghanistan’s economic fragility is exacerbated by its heavy reliance on external aid, with a 25% contraction witnessed over the past two years. Taliban-imposed restrictions on women’s education and employment further impede recovery efforts, with half of the population still languishing in poverty. While some progress has been made in meeting basic needs, households continue to grapple with vulnerability, exacerbated by limited access to financial services and employment opportunities.

Advertisement

Humanitarian Crisis

Afghanistan faces a dire humanitarian crisis marked by severe cash shortages, widespread unemployment, and unpaid salaries affecting public servants and security forces. Compounding the situation are enduring challenges stemming from a prolonged drought, the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and violence-induced displacement, all exacerbated by closed borders and soaring commodity prices, which have surged by 30 to 75 percent. The United Nations has sounded alarm bells, highlighting that 95 percent of families lack adequate food, with urban and rural areas alike bearing the brunt of food insecurity. The healthcare system teeters on the brink of collapse, with fewer than one-fifth of clinics operational, prompting the allocation of $45 million by the UN to address immediate health sector needs. In major cities like Kabul, desperation has driven individuals to sell personal belongings for survival.

Challenge of Social Cohesion and Human Rights Violations

Following the Taliban’s assumption of power in August 2021, immediate restrictions on girls and women’s rights prompted Western nations to isolate the regime through aid cuts, asset freezes, and sanctions, contributing to economic contractions and widespread hunger and poverty. In 2022, amid the fears of famine and instability, donors adopted a less punitive stance, granting exemptions to sanctions and providing substantial humanitarian aid, ranked second only to Ukraine. This aid likely averted famine, with donors hoping for policy moderation, particularly concerning girls and women. Talks in Oslo in January 2022 saw the Taliban commit to reopening female education, while Western envoys pledged economic support, including potential fund releases for Afghanistan’s central bank. Engaging the Taliban is crucial, but recognition and engagement must be conditional, focusing on ensuring humanitarian aid access, ending extrajudicial actions and harassment, ensuring girls’ education and freedom of movement, instituting a third-party monitoring mechanism for human rights, facilitating a representative Loya Jirga for an interim government leading to elections, maintaining the national flag for broader acceptance, and establishing effective aid distribution mechanisms with international organizations to address food shortages promptly. These measures represent the minimum for building confidence with the Taliban, as failure to address legitimacy could impede their ability to address security, governance, and humanitarian challenges effectively.

External Forces

Regional Powers

The Afghan conflict, despite international marginalization, remains a significant regional security concern, evolving from East-West confrontation to sectarian conflict among powerful Islamic states in the post-Cold War era. This transformation has presented challenges for regional countries, particularly in Central Asia, on two levels. Firstly, Afghanistan’s geo-strategic importance has become critical due to the emergence of new ethnic-based states in Central Asia, altering the security environment and posing challenges shaped by religion, ethnicity, and regionalism. Secondly, the Cold War legacy has influenced strategic thinking among major regional countries, resulting in a clash of interests and loose regional alignments around Afghanistan.

The impact of the conflict on Central Asian countries encompasses threats related to religious ideology, affecting domestic politics, economic and developmental challenges, constraints on communication and energy pipelines, risks associated with the “narco-corridor” from Afghanistan, trans-border terrorism, and the potential for refugee influx. As the Central Asian security profile evolves, the region is diversifying its security policy ties and orientations, while the Collective Security Treaty within the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) framework faces challenges and limitations. These changing dynamics create opportunities for increased engagement with the US and other international actors, potentially influencing the future security policy environment in the region.

In South Asia, Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan, driven by the concept of “strategic depth,” has achieved some objectives, but has negatively impacted its domestic stability. Concerns about overstretch, distraction from the Kashmir issue with India, and the potential revival of the Pushtun issue complicate Pakistan’s engagement. The Taliban’s activities have isolated Pakistan on the Afghan issue, limiting its role as a dispassionate negotiator. Iran’s relationship with Afghanistan has been strained, especially after the rise of the Taliban, leading to military maneuvers along the Afghan border.

Advertisement

India’s strategic concerns in Afghanistan are linked to its security interests, territorial integrity, and the prevention of transnational terrorism. The Soviet occupation and subsequent Afghan imbroglio, exacerbated by Pakistan’s support, have affected India’s security. The rise of the Taliban, supported by Pakistan, has put India on the defensive geopolitically, focusing its concerns on border defense in Jammu and Kashmir. Despite immediate threats from the Taliban being countered on various fronts, long-term concerns stem from externally induced developments, including the growing Chinese nexus with the Afghan Taliban, emphasizing the need for India to regain political influence and leverage in Afghanistan. The evolving geopolitical dynamics will continue shaping the security landscape, impacting the interests of regional and international actors.

International Community

Despite the Taliban’s deteriorating human rights record, particularly concerning women and girls, several factors are driving the United States and its allies toward increased engagement with the Taliban. Firstly, there’s the pressing humanitarian need in Afghanistan and the depletion of safety nets for Afghans. Secondly, the significant funding gap for humanitarian aid in 2023, coupled with growing interest in resuming development assistance, underscores the urgency to address the country’s challenges. Thirdly, the Taliban’s steady consolidation of political power and their willingness to engage with the West, alongside evidence of cooperation on certain issues, are influencing international dynamics.

As of August, the Afghanistan Humanitarian Response Plan for 2023 had received only 26.8 percent of the required $3.2 billion, revised down from the initial request of $4.6 billion. Donors’ priorities have shifted toward avoiding dependency on humanitarian aid, improving efficiency, and focusing on livelihoods amid a global context of competing needs. However, the Taliban’s human rights violations have posed a significant obstacle to broader engagement and the provision of traditional development aid by donor capitals.

Nevertheless, as time has passed, there’s a growing recognition that Taliban rule is the reality that international actors must address. Punitive measures like sanctions and suspending dialogue have not effectively moderated Taliban policies, while regional states are increasing their engagement, potentially breaking the consensus on non-recognition. This pressure, combined with concerns about Afghan economic collapse and cross-border threats, compels Western engagement to maintain influence and stability in the region.

Despite internal differences within the Taliban, including debates over policy moderation and security issues, the group remains a willing interlocutor with the West. While Kabul-based officials may influence policy implementation, engagement with the Taliban offers a potential path for influencing their behavior and promoting moderation. However, policymakers must be mindful not to replicate the failed approaches seen in North Korea, Iran, or Cuba, where punitive policies have prolonged suffering without incentivizing meaningful change. This window of opportunity for engagement with the Taliban may not remain open indefinitely, highlighting the importance of strategic and constructive diplomatic efforts to address Afghanistan’s complex challenges.

Advertisement

Assessment of Potential Scenarios and Uncertainties

The future of Afghanistan post-Taliban takeover remains uncertain and hinges on various factors, each potentially shaping the country’s trajectory in different ways. Firstly, there is the possibility of Continued Taliban Rule, wherein the group seeks to solidify its control, establish stability, and implement Islamic law, while potentially engaging with the international community on select issues. However, Internal Power Struggles within the Taliban could emerge, leading to factional infighting and weakening the group’s ability to govern effectively, thereby altering regional power dynamics.

Another potential scenario is the Resurgence of Armed Opposition, with various armed groups, including remnants of the ousted Afghan government forces, resisting Taliban rule, potentially sparking a protracted insurgency reminiscent of pre-2001 conflicts. The compounded effects of ongoing political instability, economic challenges, and potential international isolation may exacerbate the Humanitarian Crisis, worsening living conditions for the Afghan populace due to a lack of aid and resources.

Moreover, the prospect of International Engagement with the Taliban presents another avenue, where the international community may seek to diplomatically influence Taliban policies, particularly concerning human rights and inclusivity, potentially leading to either international recognition and support or increased isolation. The actions of Regional Powers such as India, Pakistan, China, Iran, and Russia will also significantly influence Afghanistan’s political landscape, as they seek to advance their own geopolitical interests.

Counterterrorism Concerns remain paramount, with the potential resurgence of terrorist organizations posing threats to regional and global security. The international community may closely monitor and intervene to counteract any rise in terrorism emanating from Afghan soil. Additionally, the possibility of a Refugee Crisis looms large, as deteriorating security and economic conditions may drive increased outflows of refugees from Afghanistan, straining neighboring countries and prompting international efforts to address the crisis.

Lastly, Afghanistan faces significant Economic Challenges, exacerbated by the Taliban’s policies, limited access to financial resources, and potential international sanctions, hindering economic recovery efforts. These interconnected factors signify the complexity and uncertainty surrounding Afghanistan’s future, requiring a balanced approach and coordinated effort from both domestic and international stakeholders to navigate the country through its current challenges.

Advertisement

End Note

Afghanistan’s future remains shrouded in uncertainty, shaped by a complex interplay of internal strife, external influences, and shifting alliances. Under Taliban control, navigating the balance of power requires honoring commitments, managing internal factions, rectifying economic mismanagement, and seeking international legitimacy. Potential routes range from steps towards inclusivity, global engagement, and effective governance. Balancing national social cohesion necessitates addressing ethnic and religious diversity, safeguarding women’s rights, and resolving human rights concerns. Economic development emerges as a linchpin amidst challenges such as poverty, aid dependency, high unemployment, and the specter of poppy farming. The role of regional powers like India, Pakistan, and Iran is pivotal, requiring a balancing act of interests, potential interventions, and addressing the refugee predicament. Security concerns loom large, encompassing terrorism, drug trafficking, and the spillover of international conflicts. The international community’s role is crucial, ranging from humanitarian aid provision to Taliban engagement and recognition. Yet, while discerning internal and external dynamics offers insight, precise projections remain elusive within this complex terrain.

Analysis

Hong Kong: A City Shaped by Heritage, Innovation, and Resilience

Hong Kong A City Shaped by Heritage, Innovation, and Resilience

The transfer of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the People’s Republic of China on July 1, 1997, marked the end of 156 years of British rule and the beginning of a new era for the region as a special administrative region (SAR) of China. This transition was governed by the “one country, two systems” principle, allowing Hong Kong to maintain its distinct economic and governing systems for 50 years, although Beijing’s influence has notably increased since the implementation of the 2020 national security law. Hong Kong’s colonial history was marked by significant events, including its expansion in 1860 and 1898, a brief Japanese occupation during World War II, and the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration, which outlined the terms of the transfer. In 1997, Hong Kong’s population of approximately 6.5 million made it the largest of the British Dependent Territories, representing 97% of their total population. The handover ceremony, attended by the then Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and broadcast globally, symbolized the end of British colonial rule in the Asia-Pacific, a region deeply influenced by historical events like the sinking of the Prince of Wales and Repulse, the fall of Singapore, and the Suez Crisis. Hong Kong’s transition is often viewed as the final chapter in the history of the British Empire, highlighting the region’s significant legacy in terms of its unique political and economic status, cultural diversity, and strategic importance in global geopolitics.

A Global Financial Powerhouse and Strategic Gateway to China

Hong Kong, a major global financial center, is the fourth-largest in the world, the ninth-largest exporter, and the eighth-largest importer. The Hong Kong dollar ranks as the tenth most traded currency globally. The city has the seventh-highest number of billionaires and the most ultra-high-net-worth individuals worldwide. Despite having one of the highest per capita incomes, Hong Kong faces significant income inequality. It also has the most buildings of any city globally, yet struggles with persistent housing shortages. Hong Kong is highly developed, with a Human Development Index (HDI) of 0.956, placing it fourth globally. The city enjoys one of the highest life expectancies and over 90% of its population uses public transportation.

Hong Kong’s unique position as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) allows it to play a crucial role in China’s high-level opening-up and the development of new, high-quality productive forces. As an international financial hub with strong ties to global markets, Hong Kong benefits from high openness and unrestricted capital movements. In contrast, mainland China’s financial market has strict foreign exchange controls and limited accessibility. This has made Hong Kong’s role as a bridge between the mainland and global markets, making it the largest offshore renminbi commercial hub and the principal source of foreign investment for the mainland. Hong Kong’s financial industry offers a wide range of financial products, minimal financing costs, and a well-known common law-based legal system, positioning it as a significant conduit for capital flows.

Advertisement

The ongoing trade tensions, particularly the United States’ efforts to curtail China’s export of solar cells, lithium batteries, and electric cars, highlight Hong Kong’s potential as a “trade intermediary.” Hong Kong’s distinct customs territory status and membership in various trade and economic organizations provide mainland businesses with a strategic advantage in circumventing trade restrictions. Hong Kong’s unrestricted currency conversion and capital flow further facilitate foreign exchange operations for mainland-registered businesses.

Hong Kong’s robust intellectual property (IP) protection, well-functioning market economy, and favorable business climate make it an ideal environment for innovation and collaboration. As a well-known global city, Hong Kong supports high-level opening-up by serving as a “breeding ground” for international brands, securing IP rights, and expanding global reach.

Hong Kong also plays a vital role in facilitating cross-cultural interactions and strengthening interpersonal ties, essential for advancing high-level opening-up. As a meeting point of East and West, Hong Kong is an ideal venue for showcasing Chinese and other cultures. The city is well-equipped to arbitrate international trade disputes, with its common law arbitration rulings recognized by over 140 countries.

Colonial Urban Planning and Infrastructure Development

Hong Kong’s unique cultural heritage is a result of its historical entanglement between China and the West. Originally a fishing port, it evolved into a global financial center under British colonial rule, which began in 1841. The British influence infused the city with Western architectural styles, blending with the traditional Han culture that had previously dominated the region. The city’s rapid economic expansion in the 1980s led to the construction of iconic skyscrapers, symbolizing its transformation into a modern metropolis. The New Territories, home to walled villages built by the Punti and Hakka people during the Ming and Qing eras, further exemplify the blending of local traditions with external influences. These villages, constructed to protect against pirate threats, feature stone walls and traditional structures, with some still intact today, such as Sam Tung Uk and Kat Hing Wai.

The British colonial legacy is also evident in Hong Kong’s architecture, particularly in the form of neoclassical government buildings repurposed for tourism after the 1997 handover. A prime example is 1881 Heritage, originally built as the naval police headquarters and now housing retail spaces and a boutique hotel. The economic reforms in China during the 1980s attracted foreign traders to Hong Kong, which became renowned for its legal system and economic freedom, often recognized as the “Best Business City in the World.” Hong Kong’s skyline, home to towering skyscrapers like the International Finance Centre and International Commerce Centre, reflects the city’s economic might. This blend of colonial architecture and modern financial landmarks highlight Hong Kong’s dynamic cultural and economic evolution, cementing its status as Asia’s leading financial hub.

Advertisement

Education & Language Policy

Hong Kong’s education system was deeply shaped by British colonial rule, which established a framework focused on academic rigor, bilingualism, and a diverse curriculum. Modelled after the British educational system, it stressed English language training and Western-style education, leading to the creation of many prestigious English-medium schools like King’s College, Diocesan Boys’ School, and St. Paul’s Coeducational College. These institutions played a significant role in shaping Hong Kong’s well-educated populace. The curriculum was designed to provide a well-rounded education in subjects such as languages, mathematics, science, and the humanities. The University of Hong Kong, founded in 1911, cemented British influence by offering Western-style higher education and producing a generation of English-speaking scholars and professionals.

During British rule, Hong Kong adopted a bilingual language policy, with both Cantonese and English recognized as official languages. English became the primary medium of instruction in schools and universities and was used in government, commerce, and the legal system. This bilingualism provided Hong Kong residents with a competitive edge in international business and trade, while the continued use of Cantonese preserved the region’s cultural identity. This dual-language approach nurtured a cosmopolitan environment that blended Eastern and Western influences. Even after the 1997 handover to China, the bilingual legacy remained, with both English and Cantonese continuing to be official languages and English proficiency remained a key feature of Hong Kong’s education system, reinforcing its global stature as a major center for trade, finance, and culture.

Cultural Identity & Nostalgia

Hong Kong is often described as “the city where East meets West,” a reflection of its unique cultural blend stemming from its geographic location, historical foreign influences, and its role as the West’s gateway to mainland China. This fusion of cultures is celebrated in the city’s vibrant cultural scene, especially during events like the 52nd Hong Kong Arts Festival and the Hong Kong International Literary Festival. These events showcase a range of performances, from the renowned La Scala Ballet company to film, theater, dance, jazz, and both Western and Chinese operas. A highlight was the inaugural Hong Kong International Cultural Summit, which brought together global leaders in arts and culture to promote international collaboration, marking the beginning of Hong Kong Art Week 2024, the largest in the Asia-Pacific region.

Art Basel, held at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, is one of the most prestigious international art fairs in the city. Featuring 243 global galleries, it presented an impressive collection of contemporary artworks by both established and emerging artists. Similarly, Art Central, another art exhibition, highlighted works from Asia’s most creative galleries. Beyond the arts, Hong Kong’s street culture, a blend of Eastern and Western influences, is also integral to its identity. The city’s rich culinary diversity, combining Chinese, Indian, Japanese, Thai, and Western influences, results in unique, hybrid dishes that reflect the city’s cultural melting pot. This blend of influences is evident in everyday life, from street signs in both Chinese and English to the sounds and smells that define the city’s urban landscape.

Hong Kong’s architecture mirrors this fusion of cultures, with modern skyscrapers standing alongside historical colonial buildings such as St. John’s Cathedral and the Old Supreme Court Building, alongside traditional Chinese temples. The city’s harbor is a vibrant mix of container ships, ocean liners, and the iconic Star Ferry, while its streets are alive with a cacophony of languages, including Cantonese, Mandarin, English, and Tagalog. The integration of diverse cultural influences is also evident in public spaces, such as taxis, where drivers may play Western pop music or Cantonese opera for their passengers. Festivals from both Western and Asian traditions, such as Christmas, Lunar New Year, the Dragon Boat Festival, and Buddha’s Birthday, are celebrated with enthusiasm, showcasing the city’s multicultural fabric.

Advertisement

The rich cultural history that has shaped Hong Kong is also part of a broader global context of cultural exchange. Ancient civilizations, including Greek, Roman, Chinese, and Islamic cultures, have left enduring legacies that have influenced various aspects of modern life, from philosophy and law to technological innovations like paper, gunpowder, and silk. These cultural elements were spread globally through trade, conquest, and migration, leading to a fusion of influences that enriched civilizations. However, the process of cultural exchange has not always been harmonious; historical conflicts, such as the Crusades, European colonization, and cultural intolerance, have resulted in the destruction of heritage and persecution of various groups. In today’s world, it is essential to shift focus from political tensions to fostering cultural understanding. Hong Kong’s celebration of its East-meets-West identity serves as a model for promoting constructive global cultural exchanges, helping to build a more tolerant and peaceful world.

Is Japan living in the Future?

Postcolonial Challenges & Resilience

In 1997, Hong Kong underwent a significant transformation when it was handed back from British to Chinese sovereignty. This marked a turning point that brought with it numerous challenges, testing the city’s resilience in the face of political, social, and economic shifts. One of the most pressing issues that arose was the increasing political unrest between pro-democracy protesters and the Chinese government. The implementation of the National Security Law in 2020 escalated tensions, sparking large-scale demonstrations advocating for democratic rights and greater autonomy. The law severely restricted civil liberties and led to the imprisonment of activists, heightening concerns about the erosion of freedoms that had been protected under the “one country, two systems” framework.

Alongside political turmoil, the handover also prompted an identity crisis among many Hong Kong residents. With the shift in governance, some individuals began to question their sense of belonging, torn between their distinct Hong Kong identity—shaped by a unique blend of Eastern and Western influences—and their connection to mainland China. The younger generation, in particular, increasingly identified as “Hongkongers,” asserting a social and cultural identity separate from China. This shift in identity, along with generational divides in opinions about the relationship with Beijing, led to rising social tensions that further complicated the post-handover transition.

Economically, the post-handover era also presented challenges for Hong Kong. As mainland China’s influence grew, market dynamics, trade relationships, and investment patterns shifted. While Hong Kong remained a global financial hub, concerns about over-reliance on mainland China began to surface, particularly regarding the potential impacts on the city’s economic independence.

Advertisement

Despite these numerous hurdles, Hong Kong has shown impressive resilience in preserving its unique identity and cultural vibrancy. The city’s thriving arts scene, diverse culinary traditions, and the continued celebration of both Eastern and Western holidays reflect the strength of its multicultural heritage. Hong Kong’s education system, which emphasizes international standards and English proficiency, has remained a pillar of academic excellence and civic engagement. Civil society has also played a crucial role in fostering activism and human rights advocacy, with local organizations and grassroots movements continuing to promote democratic values in the face of growing challenges. These efforts, along with the city’s enduring spirit, showcase Hong Kong’s resilience and its ability to adapt while preserving its distinctive identity.

Conclusion

Hong Kong’s legacy is one of dynamic evolution, juggling the demands of its current situation with the effects of its colonial past. Its urban design, architectural style, educational system, and linguistic regulations are all enduring effects of the British colonial era, which promoted a distinctive fusion of Eastern and Western elements. Significant difficulties have arisen for Hong Kong since its 1997 handover to China, including political unrest, changes in identity, and changes in the local economy. Nonetheless, the city has proven remarkably resilient because of its thriving cultural scene, dedication to top-notch education, and engaged civil society. Hong Kong perseveres in innovating and adapting despite continuous hardships, guaranteeing that its distinct identity and spirit survive for years to come.

What Makes Israel an Intelligence Giant?

Continue Reading

Analysis

United States Interest in Philippines Oil & Gas Industry Challenges China’s Claims in West Philippines Sea

United States Interest in Philippines Oil & Gas Industry Challenges China's Claims in West Philippines Sea

Introduction

The South China Sea is a region of immense strategic and economic importance, harboring vast hydrocarbon reserves that could reshape energy dynamics in Southeast Asia. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the region contains an estimated 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 11 billion barrels of oil in probable reserves, with undiscovered reserves projected at an additional 160 trillion cubic feet of gas and 12 billion barrels of oil. These resources are primarily located along the sea’s margins, with key areas like Reed Bank holding approximately 5 billion barrels of oil and 55 trillion cubic feet of gas. While countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia are advancing energy exploration projects in contested waters, the Philippines has been slower to capitalize on its resource potential due to a 2014 policy suspending exploration in disputed areas. However, with the Malampaya gas field nearing depletion, the Philippines is now ramping up efforts to revitalize its oil and gas sector through projects like redeveloping the Cadlao Oil Field and pursuing joint exploration ventures, signalling a renewed commitment to addressing energy security and rising costs.

The Philippines faces significant challenges in harnessing its vast hydrocarbon resources, primarily due to Chinese aggression in disputed waters. Despite a 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) affirming the Philippines’ exclusive rights within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and invalidating China’s “historic rights” claims under the nine-dash line, enforcement remains problematic as China refuses to recognize the decision. Confrontations, such as maritime harassment in Reed Bank, exemplify the difficulties in asserting sovereign rights over these critical resources. Nonetheless, the Philippines is taking steps to safeguard its maritime sovereignty and unlock its estimated $263 trillion worth of untapped hydrocarbon reserves. Initiatives include renewing the Malampaya service contract and attracting investments in fields like the Sulu Sea and Cotabato Basin. Coupled with proposals for joint patrols with the U.S. and stronger naval coordination, these actions underline the Philippines’ intention to secure its energy future. As the West Philippine Sea represents both the nation’s sovereignty and economic potential, the international community’s support in upholding the 2016 ruling and promoting peaceful resolutions is vital for regional stability and the responsible development of these invaluable resources.

Rich Resources in the South China Sea

The South China Sea stands as a pivotal region of paramount strategic and economic significance, primarily due to its abundant natural resources, notably vast reserves of oil and natural gas. Latest estimates from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicate that the South China Sea harbors approximately 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 11 billion barrels of oil within proven and probable reserves. Moreover, there are additional untapped resources comprising 160 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 12 billion barrels of undiscovered oil within the region.

Among the notable features in the South China Sea, the Reed Bank, also known as Recto Bank, emerges as a focal point with substantial potential for enhancing energy security in the Philippines. Estimates suggest that Reed Bank could potentially hold up to 5.4 billion barrels of oil and 55.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Despite being situated within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone (EEZ), Reed Bank is subject to territorial disputes and overlapping claims, notably by China.

Advertisement

The development of resources in the South China Sea, particularly at Reed Bank, carries significant economic implications for the Philippines. It has the potential to enhance the country’s economy by providing a stable energy source and decreasing reliance on imports. This is especially crucial as the Malampaya gas field, currently supplying 20% of Luzon’s electricity demand, is projected to be depleted by 2027.

However, challenges and tensions persist in the region, impeding exploration and development efforts. Territorial disputes, notably with China, have hindered oil and gas surveys, with Chinese coast guard vessels posing obstacles to Philippine activities. Despite international rulings affirming the Philippines’ rights over Reed Bank, China continues to assert its claims, leading to ongoing tensions.

Recent developments have seen calls for the Philippines to resume exploration endeavors at Reed Bank to address escalating energy costs and the imminent depletion of existing gas fields. Proposals for joint patrols with the United States have emerged to ensure the safety and security of exploration activities in the region.

China’s Claims vs. UNCLOS Ruling

The July 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague marked a significant moment in the longstanding dispute between the Philippines and China over the South China Sea. The tribunal’s decision favored the Philippines, declaring that China’s expansive claims within the nine-dash line held no legal basis under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This verdict upheld the Philippines’ exclusive economic rights in the region while also condemning China’s actions, including illegal fishing and the construction of artificial islands, as violations of the Philippines’ sovereign rights.

Advertisement

Despite the international legal ruling, China adamantly rejected the decision, labeling it as “null and void.” In defiance of the tribunal’s judgment, China continued to exhibit assertive behavior in the South China Sea. Notably, the China Coast Guard (CCG) intensified its patrols around key features like Scarborough Shoal, Luconia Shoals, and Second Thomas Shoal, underlining China’s persistence in asserting its sovereignty in the region. Moreover, China’s interference in the Philippines’ energy exploration activities, exemplified by incidents such as the harassment of Philippine supply ships near Second Thomas Shoal in 2023, has further added tensions between the two nations.

Recent developments in the South China Sea have seen escalating geopolitical tensions as external powers, including the United States, have become more involved, adding complexity to the already contentious situation. In November 2024, a security agreement was signed between the United States and the Philippines, signaling a joint commitment to sharing classified information and presenting a unified front against China’s maritime ambitions. Against this backdrop, confrontations between Philippine and Chinese vessels have become more frequent, resulting in injuries and damages. The escalation reached a critical juncture when Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. enacted two landmark laws aimed at defining the country’s maritime boundaries, further heightening tensions in the region.

Philippines’ Energy Challenges

The impending depletion of the Malampaya gas field, a vital energy source supplying a substantial portion of Luzon’s power needs in the Philippines, poses a looming energy crisis set to unfold by the first quarter of 2027. With the remaining reserves projected at 858.8 million standard cubic feet, the country faces the urgent need to diversify its energy portfolio to avert potential shortages and disruptions once the field is exhausted.

In response to this challenge, the Philippines has decided to shift towards harnessing renewable indigenous sources to increase its energy security. Central to this initiative is the National Renewable Energy Program (NREP), designed to elevate the share of renewable energy in the country’s power mix to 35% by 2030 and an ambitious 50% by 2040. Notably, the Philippines stands as the third-largest global producer of geothermal energy, leveraging this abundant resource with geothermal plants with an impressive 65 to 71% capacity factor, rendering them reliable baseload power providers.

Exploration of potential energy reserves, exemplified by endeavors at the Reed Bank, emerges as a pivotal component of the Philippines’ energy strategy. The Reed Bank is earmarked as a promising site for natural gas reserves, envisioned to play a crucial role in filling the void left by the Malampaya gas field’s depletion. The Department of Energy (DOE) spearheads efforts to promote the exploration and development of indigenous energy sources, emphasizing the necessity of securing a stable and sustainable power supply for the nation’s energy needs.

Advertisement

Across the energy landscape, notable milestones and initiatives highlight the Philippines’ commitment to energy diversification and sustainability. For instance, the Tiwi and Makban geothermal facilities, operated by AP Renewables Inc. collectively contribute 300 megawatts to the national grid. APRI’s innovative strides include pioneering the country’s first battery energy storage and geothermal hybrid system, enhancing grid stability and resilience. Furthermore, the NREP sets forth ambitious targets, aiming to achieve 15.3 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity by 2030, encompassing diverse sources such as hydropower, wind power, solar power, and biomass power.

To fortify energy security, the DOE is actively pursuing the development of liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminals, complementing the country’s renewable energy endeavors. This strategic move seeks to ensure a consistent supply of natural gas, consequently reducing dependency on imported fossil fuels and fortifying the Philippines’ energy resilience in the face of evolving challenges. Amidst this critical juncture, the Philippines’ concerted efforts towards renewable energy adoption and exploration activities stand as linchpins in shaping a sustainable and secure energy landscape for the nation’s future.

U.S. Interest and Joint Ventures

U.S. companies have proactively sought collaborative ventures with Philippine counterparts to delve into energy exploration endeavors within both contested and uncontested territories. A recent U.S. Presidential Trade Mission to the Philippines witnessed a significant stride in this direction, with 12 out of 22 U.S. firms unveiling joint projects and partnerships with local entities. These initiatives span a spectrum of sectors, encompassing renewable energy projects, advancements in the digital economy, and infrastructural developments. Noteworthy among these engagements are Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation’s collaboration with the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to pioneer cutting-edge nuclear solutions and Sol-Go’s expansion of solar panel manufacturing capabilities in Lipa City.

The strategic alliance between the United States and the Philippines has seen a notable reinforcement through joint military patrols and the revitalization of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). Exemplifying the essence of these joint endeavors, partnerships such as Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation’s collaboration with Meralco to advance nuclear battery solutions for clean energy highlight the fusion of technological prowess towards sustainable energy goals. Similarly, Sol-Go’s ambitious expansion plans in the solar energy sector within the Philippines, targeting a capacity of 15 megawatts by 2025, pinpoint the commitment to harnessing renewable resources for a greener future. Concurrently, ventures like Innovation Force’s collaboration with Aboitiz Power signify an effort to foster innovation in the realm of clean energy solutions. Additionally, the joint air and maritime patrols strategically conducted in the South China Sea serve as visible manifestations of the collaborative resolve between the United States and the Philippines to deter provocative actions and uphold regional stability in the face of escalating tensions.

Which Weapons the Philippines Need for its Defense in the South China Sea?

Advertisement

Regional Developments and Tensions

Despite objections from China, countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia have persisted in their exploration endeavours within the South China Sea, resolutely advancing their efforts to tap into natural resources situated within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). Malaysia, through its state-owned entity Petronas, stands out for its proactive gas exploration activities in the region, even in the face of direct pressures exerted by Chinese authorities. Concurrently, Vietnam has undertaken ambitious island-building initiatives in the Spratly Islands, a move that has triggered diplomatic protests from neighboring Malaysia, underlining the escalating competition for strategic resources in the region.

In contrast to its regional counterparts, the Philippines finds itself grappling with policy hesitations and internal debates, impeding its progress in energy exploration within the South China Sea. Despite a staunch focus on diversifying energy sources and championing clean energy initiatives, the country’s energy policy stance has inadvertently led to delays in crucial exploration activities. The Philippine Energy Plan 2023-2050 sets forth ambitious targets, aiming to carve out a 35% share for renewable energy in its power generation mix by 2030, ascending to 50% by 2040. However, the confluence of geopolitical tensions and market price fluctuations has posed formidable challenges for the Philippines in securing stable energy supplies.

Past incidents involving confrontations over drilling operations serve as stark reminders of the potential for future escalations within the region. Noteworthy instances include Chinese Coast Guard vessels encroaching on waters near Malaysia’s Kasawari gas field in 2021, sparking diplomatic protests from Kuala Lumpur. Similarly, Indonesia has grappled with Chinese vessel intrusions near the Natuna Islands, prompting Jakarta to deploy warships in response.

The South China Sea emerges as a cauldron of complex dynamics, where strategic economic interests, territorial sovereignty assertions, and environmental preservation imperatives intertwine to shape the geopolitical landscape.

Economic and Strategic Opportunities

The Sulu Sea and Cotabato Basin stand out as regions brimming with substantial untapped potential for oil and gas exploration within the Philippines. The Philippine Department of Energy has identified the offshore Sulu Sea Basin as a reservoir holding an estimated potential of 203 million barrels of oil equivalent. Similarly, the Cotabato Basin boasts a potential of 159 million barrels of oil equivalent, with an existing discovery of 29 billion cubic feet (BCF) of gas. The strategic development of these resources holds the promise of propelling the Philippines into a position of net energy exporter, thereby reducing its reliance on imported fossil fuels and catalyzing economic growth across the nation.

Advertisement

A pivotal energy asset for the Philippines, the Malampaya gas field situated off the coast of Palawan has played a crucial role in the country’s energy landscape. In a strategic move to sustain production and exploration activities within this vital field, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. inked a renewal agreement for the Malampaya Service Contract No. 38 in May 2023. Originally slated to expire in February 2024, this 25-year production contract has been extended for an additional 15 years, now stretching until February 2039. The extension encompasses a comprehensive work program, featuring geological and geophysical studies alongside the drilling of a minimum of two deep-water wells during the initial Sub-Phase 1 spanning from 2024 to 2029. This initiative is poised to unlock the full potential harbored within both the existing gas field and the adjacent prospect areas, paving the way for sustained exploration and extraction activities in the region.

China’s Criticism of U.S.-Philippines Ties

China has consistently voiced its opposition to the deepening U.S.-Philippines military ties, citing concerns over regional destabilization. Chinese officials have vehemently criticized the increased American military presence in the Philippines, framing it as a component of a broader containment strategy aimed at China and interference in regional dynamics. The Chinese embassy in Manila has explicitly warned that such military collaboration will not only jeopardize Philippine national interests but also imperil peace and stability within the region.

In stark contrast, the Philippines has staunchly defended its decision to enhance defense cooperation with the United States, asserting that such partnerships are imperative for fortifying national security and safeguarding sovereignty. Anchored in the National Security Policy (NSP) 2023 to 2028, the Philippines emphasizes the paramount importance of upholding territorial integrity and augmenting defense capabilities. The government contends that the U.S. military presence plays a pivotal role in enabling more efficient responses to natural disasters and various security threats, aligning with the nation’s strategic imperatives for safeguarding its borders and populace.

Recent developments have further heightened tensions between China and the Philippines, particularly following the Philippines’ consent in February 2023 to grant U.S. forces access to an additional four military bases under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). This move elicited strong rebuke from China, which accused the U.S. of exploiting the Philippines to encircle and constrain China’s influence. Despite the ensuing diplomatic friction, the Philippines maintains that the expansion of the EDCA sites is aimed at fostering local economic development and enhancing disaster response capabilities, underscoring the multifaceted objectives behind the strategic military arrangements.

Under the EDCA framework, the U.S. now enjoys access to a total of nine Philippine military bases, with plans in motion to transform these sites into hubs for humanitarian aid and disaster response operations. The National Security Policy (NSP) 2023 to 2028 serves as a guiding beacon, delineating the strategic roadmap for safeguarding national security interests and deepening defense collaborations with allies such as the United States, marking a pivotal component of the Philippines’ overarching security apparatus in an era fraught with geopolitical complexities and regional power dynamics.

Advertisement

Global Responsibility

The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague delivered a significant ruling on July 12, 2016, favoring the Philippines in its dispute against China over the South China Sea. The tribunal’s decision unequivocally invalidated China’s expansive claims, notably the contentious nine-dash line, citing that these claims lacked any legal grounding under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Furthermore, the ruling deemed China’s activities, such as island building and land reclamation, as unlawful, marking a pivotal moment in the legal landscape of maritime disputes in the region.

Despite the resounding verdict, China has persistently maintained its claims across a vast expanse of the South China Sea. This assertion is signified by the construction of military installations on artificial islands and the continuous deployment of coast guard and maritime militia vessels. Recent escalations include confrontations like the use of water cannons by Chinese coast guard ships against Philippine vessels near the Scarborough Shoal, actions that were swiftly condemned by the G7 foreign ministers, who emphasized the absence of legal legitimacy backing China’s territorial assertions.

Amidst these tensions, the global community, including the Philippines, has advocated for unobstructed and peaceful exploration of natural resources within the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The Philippines’ armed forces have pledged to safeguard such activities, demonstrating a commitment to ensuring the safety and security of resource exploration endeavors. Notably, efforts to facilitate joint oil exploration through a memorandum of understanding with China have encountered obstacles due to ongoing territorial disputes.

Central to discussions on regional stability is the imperative of fostering peaceful and lawful exploration within the West Philippine Sea. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has been actively engaged in formulating a code of conduct for the South China Sea, aimed at averting conflicts and upholding the primacy of international law. The Philippines has welcomed the G7’s endorsement of a rules-based order in the broader Indo-Pacific region. Beyond the legal and geopolitical dimensions, the South China Sea remains a critical maritime conduit, facilitating the transit of over $3 trillion in annual ship-borne commerce.

Should Indonesia Choose China or the US Under Prabowo Subianto Leadership?

Advertisement

Call to Action

The South China Sea, a region of immense strategic and economic importance, serves as a vital global shipping route, harbors rich natural resources, and sustains a diverse marine ecosystem. However, it has become a hotspot for territorial disputes, particularly between China and the Philippines. China’s expansive claims under the “nine-dash line” encroach on the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of several Southeast Asian nations, prompting provocative actions such as militarized artificial islands, extensive military drills, and confrontations involving its coast guard and fishing fleets. In response, the Philippines has pursued legal and legislative measures to assert its maritime rights, including a landmark 2016 ruling from the Permanent Court of Arbitration invalidating China’s claims, along with the enactment of laws like the Maritime Zones Act. Additionally, the Philippines has strengthened alliances, notably with the United States, to safeguard its interests. Resolving tensions requires robust international collaboration, adherence to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the active role of ASEAN in mediating disputes, complemented by global diplomatic efforts and freedom of navigation operations to uphold international norms and regional stability.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Should Indonesia Choose China or the US Under Prabowo Subianto Leadership?

Should Indonesia Choose China or the US Under Prabowo Subianto Leadership?

Introduction

Prabowo Subianto, Indonesia’s 8th president inaugurated on October 20, 2024, marks a significant shift following a decade under Joko Widodo’s leadership. A former general and influential figure, Prabowo’s landslide victory with 59% of the popular vote reflects broad support, totaling over 96 million votes. His nationalist approach, honed during his tenure as Minister of Defense from 2019 to 2024, underscores a focus on military strength and national defense. The change in leadership heralds expectations of a more assertive foreign policy stance, potentially entailing heightened defense spending and a stronger emphasis on national security in the context of escalating US-China tensions.

Indonesia’s pivotal position in Southeast Asia and its role in regional geopolitics magnify the importance of Prabowo’s foreign policy direction. Traditionally non-aligned, Indonesia has delicately navigated relations with major global powers, notably the US and China. Prabowo’s anticipated shift towards a more assertive foreign policy could reshape Indonesia’s diplomatic landscape. The nation’s potential entry into BRICS+, despite perceived economic benefits, raises concerns about alignment with China and opposition to Western powers. This move contrasts with Indonesia’s historical non-alignment stance and risks complicating existing partnerships within platforms like the G20 and RCEP. As the global stage evolves amidst the rise of BRICS+, including new members like Egypt, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, Indonesia faces a complex decision that could impact its regional and global positioning. Critical evaluation is crucial to ensure that Indonesia’s partnerships and engagements align with its strategic aspirations and values, especially amidst the intricate dynamics of international relations.

Historical Context

Since gaining independence in 1945, Indonesia has upheld a policy of non-alignment, seeking to maintain neutrality despite shifting global power dynamics. This approach took on a prominent role during the Cold War when Indonesia became one of the founding members of the Non-Aligned Movement. This movement was aimed at avoiding alignment with any major power blocs. A defining moment in Indonesia’s non-aligned policy came with the 1955 Bandung Conference, which the country hosted. This conference laid the groundwork for NAM and stressed principles such as mutual respect for sovereignty, non-interference in internal affairs, and peaceful coexistence.

Indonesia’s approach to foreign policy has varied significantly under different leaders, each adapting the country’s stance to reflect both personal ideology and the demands of the international environment. Under President Sukarno (1945-1967), Indonesia’s foreign policy was confrontational, particularly towards Western powers. Sukarno promoted the concept of the New Emerging Forces (NEFOS) as a coalition of newly independent states and revolutionary groups opposed to the Old Established Forces (OLDEFOS), which represented Western imperial powers. Indonesia took an active stance in global forums, advocating for anti-colonial movements and pushing for a new world order led by developing nations. However, following a CIA-supported coup in 1965, President Suharto (1967-1998) led a dramatic shift towards pro-Western alignment. Suharto strengthened ties with the United States and distanced Indonesia from China, especially in light of regional tensions. During this period, Indonesia became involved in several regional conflicts, including the controversial invasion of East Timor in 1975, marking a significant shift from Sukarno’s more independent stance.

Advertisement

More recently, President Joko Widodo (2014-2024) adopted a “free and active” foreign policy, embodying a balance between Western and Asian alliances. Under Widodo, Indonesia strengthened economic ties with China while remaining engaged with traditional allies like the United States.

Prabowo Subianto’s Foreign Policy

Prabowo Subianto’s foreign policy approach is a blend of nationalism and pragmatism, aimed increase Indonesia’s sovereignty, security, and economic wellbeing through strategic alliances. The former general turned president is dedicated to enhance Indonesia’s defense capabilities by modernizing its armed forces and defense expenditures. Central to Prabowo’s vision is the preservation of Indonesia’s non-aligned status, steering clear of overreliance on any single global power bloc. His commitment to a “free and active” foreign policy strategy signifies Indonesia’s quest for autonomy and influence.

Prabowo has demonstrated a balanced diplomatic approach by actively engaging with both China and the United States. Noteworthy was his visit to Beijing in April 2024, where he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping and solidified ties through agreements totaling approximately $10 billion across various sectors like infrastructure, green energy, digital technology, and agriculture. Concurrently, Prabowo reaffirmed Indonesia’s relationship with the United States by meeting President Joe Biden at the White House in November 2024 to commemorate the 75th anniversary of bilateral ties. Discussions focused on strengthening security cooperation and addressing mutual challenges, such as ensuring freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.

 Strategic Importance of Indonesia

Indonesia’s geopolitical significance is anchored in its strategic location, which places it at the crossroads of key global trade routes. Positioned between the Pacific Ocean, the Malacca Straits, and the Indian Ocean, Indonesia plays a pivotal role in regional and global geopolitics. The country controls crucial maritime chokepoints, with over half of all international shipping passing through its waters, making it a critical hub for global trade. As the largest archipelagic nation in the world, Indonesia’s vast maritime territory not only grants it significant influence over regional security but also enhances its role in maintaining economic stability throughout Southeast Asia. Moreover, as the only Southeast Asian member of the G-20, Indonesia holds a prominent voice in global economic discussions.

Advertisement

Economically, the nation is the largest in Southeast Asia, with a GDP of approximately $1.4 trillion, the world’s tenth-largest economy in terms of purchasing power parity. The country’s economic growth has been driven by key sectors such as manufacturing, services, and natural resources, positioning it as a vital player in the regional and global economy.

In the realm of defense, Indonesia has traditionally focused on addressing internal security threats, including separatism and terrorism. However, the rise of China’s maritime assertiveness in the South China Sea has prompted a reevaluation of Indonesia’s defense strategy. Although Indonesia’s defense budget is relatively modest, accounting for less than 1% of its GDP (compared to Singapore’s 3%), the country has made significant strides in modernizing its military. The government has invested in acquiring new military equipment and technology to enhance Indonesia’s power-projection capabilities, ensuring that it can effectively safeguard its territorial integrity and play an influential role in regional security matters.

Relations with China and the US

The economic partnership between China and Indonesia has grown substantially in recent years, highlighted by a trade volume of approximately $1.39 billion in 2023. This robust trade relationship is supported by a series of bilateral agreements. In 2022, Indonesia and China signed five key agreements focusing on economic, maritime, and trade collaboration. Notably, these agreements include the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway project, a significant infrastructure development, and the establishment of industrial zones such as the Morowali Industrial Park. Additionally, China pledged $21.7 billion in new investments in 2023, which spanned diverse sectors, including e-commerce, industry, agriculture, fisheries, science, technology, and innovation.

Indonesia’s security ties with the United States are solidified through their Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, which encompasses a wide range of cooperative efforts. This partnership includes collaboration on border security, counter-proliferation, cybersecurity, counterterrorism, maritime security, and humanitarian assistance. A key recent development in this relationship occurred in November 2024, when Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto met with U.S. President Joe Biden to discuss further strengthening defense cooperation, with an emphasis on maritime security and counter-terrorism.

Aligning more closely with China offers several potential benefits for Indonesia. Economic growth is a key advantage, as China’s investments and trade agreements help boost Indonesia’s economic infrastructure. In particular, collaboration in sectors such as renewable energy and electric vehicles offers opportunities for technological transfer, enhancing Indonesia’s capabilities in these rapidly growing industries. However, there are also risks associated with this closer alignment. One concern is the potential for increased debt dependency, as large-scale Chinese investments could lead to Indonesia becoming more economically reliant on China. Additionally, aligning too closely with China could create geopolitical tensions, particularly with other regional powers and the United States, possibly complicating Indonesia’s foreign policy and security strategy.

Advertisement

Aligning with the United States offers several benefits for Indonesia, particularly in terms of advanced defense technology. Access to cutting-edge military equipment from the U.S. enhances Indonesia’s ability to secure its maritime borders and address security threats. Economically, strong ties with the U.S. can open up new markets and investment opportunities for Indonesian businesses. However, there are also risks to this alignment. One potential downside is the political pressure that Indonesia may face in regional and global affairs, as the U.S. could exert influence over Indonesia’s foreign policy choices. Additionally, Indonesia faces the challenge of balancing its relations with both China and the U.S., as aligning too closely with one power may risk alienating the other, making it difficult for Indonesia to navigate its geopolitical positioning in a region marked by intensifying rivalries.

Balancing Act: Examples of Successful Non-Aligned Policies

Several countries have successfully implemented non-aligned policies, balancing relations with major powers while promoting their own national interests.

  • India has maintained a non-aligned stance since the Cold War, engaging in strategic partnerships with both the United States and Russia. India has participated in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) alongside the U.S., Japan, and Australia to counterbalance China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. At the same time, India has continued to foster strong ties with Russia, particularly in defense cooperation.
  • Nepal offers a more localized example of balancing relations between two powerful neighbors, China and India. Nepal has adopted a hedging strategy, participating in China’s Belt and Road Initiative to secure much-needed infrastructure investments, while simultaneously maintaining strong economic and cultural ties with India.
  • Egypt provides another example of a successful non-aligned policy, particularly during the Cold War when it maintained relations with both the United States and the Soviet Union. In recent years, Egypt has continued to balance its foreign policy by engaging in regional diplomacy and participating in international organizations like the United Nations and the Arab League.

Can ASEAN Break Free From Dynastic Politics?

Potential Scenarios and Their Impact on Indonesia’s Future

Several potential scenarios outline the trajectory Indonesia might follow in the coming years, each with its own set of benefits and risks.

  • Scenario 1: Stronger Alignment with China
    A closer alignment with China could bring significant economic advantages to Indonesia, including increased investments in infrastructure and technology transfer. For instance, China’s $21.7 billion investment pledge in 2023 covers key sectors such as e-commerce, industry, and agriculture, which could bolster Indonesia’s economic growth. However, this scenario also comes with potential risks. Indonesia could face increased debt dependency, as large-scale investments could strain the country’s finances over time. Moreover, closer ties with China might lead to geopolitical tensions with other regional powers, particularly in Southeast Asia.
  • Scenario 2: Stronger Alignment with the US
    Aligning more closely with the United States offers several strategic advantages, particularly in terms of military cooperation and economic opportunities. Access to advanced military technology and equipment, such as the U.S.-supplied F-16 fighter jets and Apache helicopters, would significantly enhance Indonesia’s defense capabilities. Economically, stronger ties with the U.S. could open new markets and foster investment opportunities. However, such an alignment might also expose Indonesia to political pressures from the U.S., particularly in regional and global affairs.
  • Scenario 3: Maintaining a Non-Aligned Stance
    Maintaining a non-aligned stance would allow Indonesia to preserve its sovereignty and diplomatic flexibility. This approach would enable Indonesia to engage with multiple partners, including both China and the U.S., without being overly dependent on any single power. Non-alignment has allowed countries like India to successfully maintain strategic partnerships with both the U.S. and Russia while promoting their own interests in global affairs. However, non-alignment is not without its challenges. Indonesia could face limitations in accessing certain resources and alliances, and may find it difficult to secure favorable trade deals without the backing of a major global power. Additionally, non-aligned nations may find themselves isolated in geopolitical conflicts where they lack strong allies to support their positions.
Continue Reading

Trending